ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019
A new modular mechanism that allows full detachability and cleaning of steerable laparoscopic instruments.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative study on trocar configurations and the use of steerable instruments in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia surgery training.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- A Hybrid Compliant-Tendon Laparoscopic Instrument for Distal Articulation and Grasping: Design and Experimental Validation.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- A compact hand-held continuum manipulator for minimally invasive neurosurgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Smart Force Sensing in Robot Surgery Utilising the Back Electromotive Force.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A review of wrist mechanism design and the application in gastrointestinal minimally invasive surgery of multi-degree-of-freedom surgical laparoscopic instruments.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Review of robotic surgery platforms and end effectors.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Design and In Vitro Validation of an Orthopaedic Drill Guide for Femoral Stem Revision in Total Hip Arthroplasty.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024Article
- Design, Analysis and Experimental Validation of a Novel 7-Degrees of Freedom Instrument for Laparoscopic Surgeries.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Design and Evaluation of a Balanced Compliant Laparoscopic Grasper.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2023Article
- The MISLI-Drive, a modular sterilizable robotic driver for steerable laparoscopic instruments.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Article
- Reprocessing Zamak laryngoscope blades into new instrument parts; an 'all-in-one' experimental study.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons.Updates in surgery · 2022Article
- A novel Veress needle mechanism that reduces overshooting after puncturing the abdominal wall.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- A life cycle assessment of reprocessing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Assessment of laparoscopic instrument reprocessing in rural India: a mixed methods study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2021Article
- Comparison of Laparoscopic Steerable Instruments Performed by Expert Surgeons and Novices.Veterinary sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEver since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery, researchers have been trying to add steerability to instruments to allow the surgeon to operate with better reachability and less tissue interaction force. Traditional solutions to introduce this often use a combination of springs, cables, pulleys, and guiding structures, resulting in instruments that cannot be properly cleaned and thus are very costly to manufacture and maintain. The aim of the study is to develop a novel affordable, sustainable, cableless, and fully steerable laparoscopic grasper, and to test its ease of assembly, disassembly, and use.
methodsA set of requirements was defined to ensure that the instrument can be handled efficiently at the sterilization unit and in the operating room. Based on these, a multisteerable, cableless 5 mm laparoscopic instrument that operates based on shaft rotations was developed. To test its assembly and disassembly, ten participants were asked to fully dismantle the instrument and reassemble it a total of 60 times. In addition, ten medical students were asked to use the grasper in the ForceSense box-trainer system on a newly developed 3D pick-and-place task, to determine the control effort based on learning curves of steering errors, task time, instrument path length, and maximum tissue interaction force.
resultsAll important design requirements were met. The recorded data indicates that ten engineering students were able to fully dismantle and reassemble the instrument shaft in 12 s (SD7) and 65 s (SD43) seconds at the sixth attempt. The learning-curve data indicates that three attempts were needed before the ten medical students started to use all steering functions. At the sixth attempt, on average only 1.25 (SD0.7) steering errors were made. The steepest slope in the learning curves for steering errors, path length, and task time was experienced during the first three attempts. In respect of the interaction force, no learning effect was observed.
conclusionThe multi-DOF (degree of freedom) cableless grasper can be assembled and disassembled for cleaning and sterilization within an acceptable time frame. The handle interface proved to be intuitive enough for novices to conduct a complex 3D pick-and-place task in a training setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.