Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31144093›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2020

Multicenter analysis of posterior urethroplasty complexity and outcomes following pelvic fracture urethral injury.

Niels Vass Johnsen, Rachel A Moses, Sean P Elliott, Alex J Vanni, Nima Baradaran, Garrick Greear, Thomas G Smith, Michael A Granieri, Nejd F Alsikafi, Bradley A Erickson and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Outcomes of partial pubectomy assisted anastomotic urethroplasty for male patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. [Combined transperineal and transpubic urethroplasty for patients with complex male pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2020
    Article
  15. The Urological Society of India Guidelines for the management of urethral stricture (Executive Summary).Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2021
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Niels Vass JohnsenDepartments of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. nielsvj@uw.edu.
Rachel A MosesUniversity of Utah, Salk Lake City, UT, USA.
Sean P ElliottUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Alex J VanniLahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
Nima BaradaranUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Garrick GreearUniversity of California, San Diego, USA.
Thomas G SmithBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Michael A GranieriNew York University, New York, NY, USA.
Nejd F AlsikafiUropartners, Gurnee, IL, USA.
Bradley A EricksonUniversity of Iowa (BAE), Iowa City, IA, USA.
Jeremy B MyersUniversity of Utah, Salk Lake City, UT, USA.
Benjamin N BreyerUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jill C BuckleyUniversity of California, San Diego, USA.
Lee C ZhaoNew York University, New York, NY, USA.
Bryan B VoelzkeDepartments of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Trauma Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons(TURNS)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze outcomes of posterior urethroplasty following pelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUI) and to determine risk factors for surgical complexity and success.

methodsPatients who underwent posterior urethroplasty following PFUI were identified in the Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons (TURNS) database. Demographics, injury patterns, management strategies, and prior interventions were evaluated. Risk factors for surgical failure and the impact of ancillary urethral lengthening maneuvers (corporal splitting, pubectomy and supracrural rerouting) were evaluated.

resultsOf the 436 posterior urethroplasties identified, 122 were following PFUI. 83 (68%) patients were acutely managed with suprapubic tubes, while 39 (32%) underwent early endoscopic realignment. 16 (13%) patients underwent pelvic artery embolization in the acute setting. 116 cases (95%) were completed via a perineal approach, while 6 (5%) were performed via an abdominoperineal approach. The need for one or more ancillary maneuvers to gain urethral length occurred in 4 (36%) patients. Of these, 44 (36%) received corporal splitting, 16 (13%) partial or complete pubectomy, and 2 (2%) supracrural rerouting. Younger patients, those with longer distraction defects, and those with a history of angioembolization were more likely to require ancillary maneuvers. 111 patients (91%) did not require repeat intervention during follow-up. Angioembolization (p = 0.03) and longer distraction defects (p = 0.01) were associated with failure.

conclusionsPosterior urethroplasty provides excellent success rates for patients following PFUI. Pelvic angioembolization and increased defect length are associated with increased surgical complexity and risk of failure. Surgeons should be prepared to implement ancillary maneuvers when indicated to achieve a tension-free anastomosis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFractures, BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedPelvic BonesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrethraUrologic Surgical Procedures, MaleYoung AdultAngioembolizationDistraction defectPelvic fracture urethral injuryPosterior urethroplastyUrethral strictureUrotrauma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.