Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31144072›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Shear-wave elastography: role in clinically significant prostate cancer with false-negative magnetic resonance imaging.

Li-Hua Xiang, Yan Fang, Jing Wan, Guang Xu, Ming-Hua Yao, Shi-Si Ding, Hui Liu, Rong Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Hua XiangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Yan FangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Jing WanDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Guang XuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Ming-Hua YaoDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Shi-Si DingDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Hui LiuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Rong WuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Shanghai, 200072, China. wurong7111@163.com.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81471673 and 81671699the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 17411967400the Shanghai Hospital Development Center SHDC12016233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze the diagnostic value of adding SWE to MRI for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer with false-negative MRI results.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of 367 patients who underwent MRI, SWE, and prostate biopsy between March 2016 and November 2018 at the Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free PSA (fPSA) were measured preoperatively. Diagnostic value and accuracy was determined for MRI alone and MRI + SWE using the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.

resultsMRI misdiagnosed 17.9% (21/117) clinically significant prostate cancers, including 15 lesions in the peripheral zone and 6 in the central zone. Both qualitative and quantitative SWE could help detect 66.7% (10/15) significant prostate cancers with false-negative MRI, but there was no association with the Gleason score (p > 0.05). When considering the sextant of the peripheral zone, a significant association was not seen with histopathology in qualitative SWE (p = 0.071) and quantitative SWE (p = 0.598). Among age, PSA, fPSA, volume of the prostate gland, fPSA/PSA, and PSAD, only PSAD (p = 0.019) was associated with SWE results in patients with negative MRI.

conclusionsAdding SWE to MRI in patients with negative MRI for prostate examination could allow the correct diagnosis of additional patients and reduce the false-negative rate. KEY POINTS: • MRI plays an important role in clinically significant prostate cancers diagnosis. • SWE plays an important role in clinically significant prostate cancers with negative MRI. • Adding SWE to MRI in patients with negative MRI for prostate examination could allow the correct diagnosis of additional patients and reduce the false-negative rate.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyChinaElasticity Imaging TechniquesFalse Negative ReactionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsProstate-Specific AntigenBiopsyMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID31144072
OpenAlexW2947167195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.