Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31143993›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2019

A case-control pilot study of stress fracture in adolescent girls: the discriminative ability of two imaging technologies to classify at-risk athletes.

R L Duckham, S R Bialo, J Machan, P Kriz, C M Gordon

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R L DuckhamInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN) School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
S R BialoDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Rhode Island Hospital/Hasbro Children's Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
J MachanDivision of Biostatistics, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
P KrizDivision of Sports Medicine, Departments of Orthopedics and Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School Rhode Island Hospital/Hasbro Children's Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
C M GordonDivision of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. catherine.gordon@childrens.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-9143
Brown University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USDeakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since stress fractures are common among adolescent athletes, it is important to identify bone assessment tools that accurately identify risk. We investigated the discriminative ability of two imaging technologies to classify at-risk athletes. Findings suggested that peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) has the ability to distinguish differences in bone structure in injured vs. uninjured limbs.

introductionGiven the high stress fracture (SFX) prevalence among adolescent girls, an understanding of the most informative assessment tools to identify SFX risks are required. We investigated the discriminative ability of pQCT vs. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to classify athletes with or without SFX.

methodsTwelve adolescent athletes diagnosed with a lower-extremity SFX were compared with 12 matched controls. DXA measured areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and content of the total body, and lumbar spine. Bilateral tibiae were assessed with pQCT. At the metaphysis (3%), total density (ToD), trabecular density (TrD), trabecular area (TrA), and estimated bone strength in compression (BSIc), and at the diaphysis (38% and 66%), total bone area (ToA), cortical density (CoD), cortical area (CoA), estimated bone strength in torsion (SSIp), and peri- and endocortical and muscle area (MuA) were obtained. Cortical bone mass/density around the center of mass and marrow density (estimate of adiposity) were calculated using ImageJ software. General estimated equations adjusting for multiple comparisons (Holm-Bonferroni method) were used to compare means between (1) injured limb of the case athletes vs. uninjured limb of the control athletes and (2) uninjured limb of the case athletes vs. uninjured limbs of the controls and injured vs. uninjured limb of case athletes with a SFX.

resultsaBMD and content showed no significant differences between cases and controls. When comparing the injured vs. uninjured leg in the case athletes by pQCT at the 3% tibia, unadjusted TrD, total density, and BSIc were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the injured vs. uninjured leg. Marrow density at the 66% site was 1% (p < 0.05) lower in the injured vs. uninjured leg.

conclusionsThese preliminary data in athletes with SFX suggest that pQCT has the ability to distinguish differences in bone structure in injured vs. uninjured limbs. No discriminative bone parameter classifications were identified between adolescent athletes with or without SFX.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAdolescentAnthropometryAthletic InjuriesBone DensityCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleFractures, StressHumansLeg InjuriesLower ExtremityLumbar VertebraePilot ProjectsRisk AssessmentBone mineral densityFemalesMarrow densityStress fractureTrabecular density

Identifiers

PMID31143993
OpenAlexW2947472417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.