ArticleExperimental brain research2019
The effects of conditioning startling acoustic stimulation (SAS) on the corticospinal motor system: a SAS-TMS study.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Is the StartReact Effect?Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Excitation-inhibition imbalance in the motor control network: a key factor in post-stroke spasticity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Response triggering by an acoustic stimulus increases with stimulus intensity and is best predicted by startle reflex activation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) could cause transient effects on the primary motor cortex and its descending tracts after habituation of reflex responses. In the literature, there is evidence that the effects of SAS depend on the status of M1 excitability and delivery time of SAS. In this study, we aimed to comprehensively investigate the effects of SAS on the excitability of primary motor cortex. Eleven healthy subjects participated in this study. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered to the hot spot for left biceps at rest and during isometric right elbow flexion (10, 30, and 60% of their maximum voluntary contraction, MVC). There were three SAS conditions: (1) No SAS; (2) SAS was delivered 50 ms prior to TMS (SAS50); (3) SAS 90 ms prior to TMS (SAS90). For each subject, the induced MEP amplitude was normalized to the largest response at rest with No SAS. Two-way ANOVAs (4 force levels × 3 SAS conditions) with repeated measures were used to determine the differences under different conditions. For the MEP amplitude, there were significant force level effect and FORCE LEVEL × SAS interactions. Specifically, the MEP amplitude increased with force level. Furthermore, post hoc analysis showed that the MEP amplitude reduced during SAS50 and SAS90 compared to No SAS only at rest. Our results provide evidence that a conditioning SAS causes a transient suppression of the corticospinal excitability at rest when it is delivered 50 ms and 90 ms prior to TMS. However, a conditioning SAS has no effect when the corticospinal excitability is already elevated with an external visual target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.