ArticleVirusdisease2019
Infectivity of cloned begomoviral DNAs: an appraisal.
Article in Virusdisease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resistance Assessment to PHYVV and PepGMV in Wild and Domesticated Accessions ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genetic Diversity and Geographic Distribution of Cucurbit-Infecting Begomoviruses in the Philippines.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Construction of Infectious Clones of Begomoviruses: Strategies, Techniques and Applications.Biology · 2021Review
- Harnessed viruses in the age of metagenomics and synthetic biology: an update on infectious clone assembly and biotechnologies of plant viruses.Plant biotechnology journal · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infectivity of cloned begomoviral DNAs is an important criterion to establish the etiology of the disease it causes, to study viral gene functions and host-virus interactions. Three main methods have been employed to study infectivity; mechanical inoculation with cloned viral DNA using abrasives, Agrobacterium-mediated inoculation (agroinoculation) of cloned viral DNA and bombardment using microprojectiles coated with cloned viral DNA (biolistics). Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages and the adoption of one over the other for demonstrating infectivity depends on various factors. This review compares the various features associated with the above three methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.