ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2019
The influence of liver fat deposition on the quantification of the liver-iron fraction using fast-kilovolt-peak switching dual-energy CT imaging and material decomposition technique: an
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal energy level of virtual monoenergetic images for iron detectability in dual-energy CT: a Phantom study.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Quantification of myocardial iron and fat-an experimental study with photon-counting detector CT.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Narrative review of magnetic resonance imaging in quantifying liver iron load.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Harnessing dual-energy CT for glycogen quantification: a phantom analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Accuracy and applicability of dual-energy computed tomography in quantifying vertebral bone marrow adipose tissue compared with magnetic resonance imaging.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- Quantitative assessment of liver steatosis using ultrasound: dual-energy CT.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2021Review
- Simultaneous hepatic iron and fat quantification with dual-energy CT in a rabbit model of coexisting iron and fat.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Dual-energy computed tomography could reliably differentiate metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes of less than 0.5 cm in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Fast kilovoltage (KV)-switching dual-energy computed tomography hydroxyapatite (HAP)-water decomposition technique for identifying bone marrow edema in vertebral compression fractures.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2020Article
- Investigating Dual-Energy CT Post-Contrast Phases for Liver Iron Quantification: A Preliminary Study.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the feasibility of dual-energy spectral computed tomography (DECT) for quantifying the liver iron content (LIC) with material decomposition (MD) technique
methodsLiver-iron mixture samples (model A) and liver-iron-fat mixture samples (model B) were prepare and scanned by a single source DECT using GSI mode with successive tube currents of 200, 320, and 485 mA. A standard algorithm of 1.25 mm was used to reconstruct iron (fat) MD images and iron (water) MD images. The iron concentrations of all samples were measured and analyzed by Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression analysis.
resultsSignificant positive linear correlations were found between virtual iron content (VIC) and LIC in the absence of fat (model A) and in the presence of fat (model B) in the range of LIC 0 to 25 mg/mL. The lines of best fit to model A had slopes around 1.1 and an intercept around (-1.5) mg/mL for iron (water) MD images, and had slopes around 1.1 and an intercept around (-10) mg/mL for iron (fat) MD images. The lines of best fit to the model B had slopes around 1.5 and an intercept around (-15) mg/mL. At the same value of LIC (LIC >0), the VIC values of model A were always higher than those of model B. At the high value of LIC (12.5 mg/mL), the VIC values of model B were similar, but they differed greatly from those of model A.
conclusionsThe fast-kilovolt-peak switching dual-energy CT imaging and MD techniques allow for quantification of iron content. Fat and the post-reconstruction algorithm of iron (fat) MD images, were confounding factors, and led to the underestimation and overestimation of LIC, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.