Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31143538›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Functional analysis of the

Ping Wang, Sai Zhang, Jing Qiao, Quan Sun, Qian Shi, Chaowei Cai, Jianchuan Mo, Zongyan Chu, Youlu Yuan, Xiongming Du and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strigolactones: diversity, perception, and hydrolysis.Phytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ping Wang *State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Henan Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics Center, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Sai Zhang *State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Henan Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics Center, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Jing QiaoState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Henan Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics Center, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Quan SunCollege of Bioinformation, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7228-9363
Qian ShiState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Henan Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics Center, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Chaowei CaiState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Henan Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics Center, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Jianchuan MoState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Henan Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics Center, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Zongyan ChuKaifeng Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, Kaifeng, China.
Youlu YuanState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Cotton Genetic Improvement, Cotton Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China.
Xiongming DuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Cotton Genetic Improvement, Cotton Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China.
Yuchen MiaoState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Henan Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics Center, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Xiao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Henan Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics Center, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Yingfan CaiState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Henan Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics Center, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Henan University · CNCotton Research Institute · CNChongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant architecture, including branching pattern, is an important agronomic trait of cotton crops. In recent years, strigolactones (SLs) have been considered important plant hormones that regulate branch development. In some species such as Arabidopsis, DWARF14 is an unconventional receptor that plays an important role in the SL signaling pathway. However, studies on SL receptors in cotton are still lacking. Here, we cloned and analysed the structure of the GbD14 gene in

Indexed as

BranchCottonGbD14Gene functionHormoneStrigolactone

Identifiers

PMID31143538
PMCPMC6524629
OpenAlexW2945943819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.