Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31143526›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2019

The Protective Effects of Blue Light-Blocking Films With Different Shielding Rates: A Rat Model Study.

Xin Liu, Qi Zhou, Hui Lin, Jinzhong Wu, Zijing Wu, Shen Qu, Yanlong Bi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. More light components and less light damage on rats' eyes: evidence for the photobiomodulation and spectral opponency.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Photoactivatable Cre knock-in mice for spatiotemporal control of genetic engineering in vivo.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xin LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qi ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hui LinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jinzhong WuActif Polarizers Technology R & D Center, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Zijing WuActif Polarizers Technology R & D Center, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Shen QuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yanlong BiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tongji University · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine light emitting diode (LED)-induced retinal photochemical damage and assess the protective performance of blue light-shielding films with different shielding rates in Sprague-Dawley rats (SD rats).

methodsSD rats were randomly divided into five groups: blank control (group I), white LED illumination (group II), and white LED illumination combined with shielding of blue light of wavelength 440 nm at 40%, 60%, and 80% (groups III, IV, and V). The illumination was 200 lux. All animals underwent electroretinography (ERG), hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observation after 14 days of dark-adaptation before illumination, after 14 days of cyclic illumination, and after 14 days of darkness for recovery following illumination.

resultsERG showed retinal functional loss after LED light exposure. However, retinal cell function was partly recovered after a further 2 weeks of dark adaptation. H&E staining and TEM revealed increases in photoreceptor cell death after illumination. IHC staining demonstrated that oxidative stress was associated with retinal injury. Although retinal light injury was discovered in the LED light-exposure groups, shielding 60% of blue light of wavelength 440 nm (bandwidth 20 nm) protected retinas.

conclusionsCyclic illumination of low light intensity (200 lux) for 14 days produced retinal degeneration; shielding 60% of blue light may protect retinas from light damage. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This study found the effective shielding rate that could protect retinas from light damage when shielding specific narrow-band harmful blue light; thus providing a more normative method for protecting eyes from blue light hazard.

Indexed as

blue lightlight emitting dioderetinal photochemical damageshielding ratewavelength

Identifiers

PMID31143526
PMCPMC6526960
OpenAlexW2946812768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.