Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31143489›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2019

En face optical coherence tomography: a technology review [Invited].

R A Leitgeb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Macular hole with epiretinal proliferation: diagnostic value of en-face optical coherence tomography and clinical characteristics.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Scattering-Based Light-Sheet Microscopy Imaging of Human Papillomavirus-Associated Squamous Lesions of the Anal Canal: A Proof-of-Principle Study.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R A LeitgebCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A review on the technological development of en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence microscopy (OCM) is provided. The terminology originally referred to time domain OCT, where the preferential scanning was performed in the en face plane. Potentially the fastest realization of en face image recording is full-field OCT, where the full en face plane is illuminated and recorded simultaneously. The term has nowadays been adopted for high-speed Fourier domain approaches, where the en face image is reconstructed from full 3D volumes either by direct slicing or through axial projection in post processing. The success of modern en face OCT lies in its immediate and easy image interpretation, which is in particular of advantage for OCM or OCT angiography. Applications of en face OCT with a focus on ophthalmology are presented. The review concludes by outlining exciting technological prospects of en face OCT based both on time as well as on Fourier domain OCT.

Identifiers

PMID31143489
PMCPMC6524600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.