Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31143338›Full record

ReviewThe Pan African medical journal2019

Open abdomen management and outcomes: two case reports from western Kenya and a review of literature from Africa.

Clifford Mwita, Ruth Negesa, Marissa Boeck, Andrew Wandera

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Pan African medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Clifford MwitaDepartment of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya.
Ruth NegesaDepartment of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya.
Marissa BoeckDepartment of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia, New York, United State of America.
Andrew WanderaDepartment of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The open abdomen (OA) is clinically indicated for attenuating the effects of select intra-abdominal insults that may lead to high intra-abdominal pressure with fascial closure. Despite the high incidence of conditions warranting OA in Africa, there are few reports on its use and outcomes. A retrospective chart review was performed for two patients managed with an OA at the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital. For comparison, a literature review on related studies from Africa was performed. One patient had an anastomotic leak, while the other had a perforated gastric ulcer. A Bogotá bag was used for temporary abdominal content containment. There was no mortality in our series and fascial closure was achieved in one patient. Upon review of studies from Africa, overall mortality stood at 44%, while 25% of surviving patients underwent fascial closure. The use of OA in Africa is associated with high mortality and low rates of fascial closure. Our limited experience shows this technique is a viable treatment option in an attempt to bridge a patient to abdominal closure during critical illness.

Indexed as

AbdomenAbdominal CavityAdultAnastomosis, SurgicalFasciaHumansKenyaMalePeptic Ulcer PerforationRetrospective StudiesStomach UlcerTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultlaparostomyOpen abdomenSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID31143338
PMCPMC6522152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.