Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31143314›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2019

Phenotyping to Facilitate Accrual for a Cardiovascular Intervention.

Kavishwar B Wagholikar, Christina M Fischer, Alyssa P Goodson, Christopher D Herrick, Taylor E Maclean, Katelyn V Smith, Liliana Fera, Thomas A Gaziano, Jacqueline R Dunning, Joshua Bosque-Hamilton and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kavishwar B WagholikarHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Christina M FischerBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Alyssa P GoodsonPartners Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher D HerrickPartners Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA.
Taylor E MacleanBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Katelyn V SmithBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Liliana FeraBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Thomas A GazianoBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jacqueline R DunningBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Joshua Bosque-HamiltonBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Lina MattaBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Eloy ToscanoPartners Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA.
Brent RichterPartners Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA.
Layne AinsworthPartners Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael F OatesPartners Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA.
Samuel AronsonPartners Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA.
Calum A MacRaeHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Benjamin M SciricaHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Akshay S DesaiHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Shawn N MurphyHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Developing i2b2 into a Health Innovation Platform for Clinical Decision Support in the Genomics EraR01HG009174 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARONSON, SAMUEL JEFFREY, MACRAE, CALUM A. · 2016 to 2019
$2.9M
A Framework to Enhance Decision Support by Invoking NLP: Methods and ApplicationsR00LM011575 · NLM · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WAGHOLIKAR, KAVISHWAR B. · 2016 to 2018
$749k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009174NLM NIH HHS R00 LM011575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe conventional approach for clinical studies is to identify a cohort of potentially eligible patients and then screen for enrollment. In an effort to reduce the cost and manual effort involved in the screening process, several studies have leveraged electronic health records (EHR) to refine cohorts to better match the eligibility criteria, which is referred to as phenotyping. We extend this approach to dynamically identify a cohort by repeating phenotyping in alternation with manual screening.

methodsOur approach consists of multiple screen cycles. At the start of each cycle, the phenotyping algorithm is used to identify eligible patients from the EHR, creating an ordered list such that patients that are most likely eligible are listed first. This list is then manually screened, and the results are analyzed to improve the phenotyping for the next cycle. We describe the preliminary results and challenges in the implementation of this approach for an intervention study on heart failure.

resultsA total of 1,022 patients were screened, with 223 (23%) of patients being found eligible for enrollment into the intervention study. The iterative approach improved the phenotyping in each screening cycle. Without an iterative approach, the positive screening rate (PSR) was expected to dip below the 20% measured in the first cycle; however, the cyclical approach increased the PSR to 23%.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that dynamic phenotyping can facilitate recruitment for prospective clinical study. Future directions include improved informatics infrastructure and governance policies to enable real-time updates to research repositories, tooling for EHR annotation, and methodologies to reduce human annotation.

Indexed as

Cohort identificationElectronic health recordsInterventionPhenotyping

Identifiers

PMID31143314
PMCPMC6522233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.