ArticleARYA atherosclerosis2018
Cryoballoon ablation results and complications in mid-term follow-up of patients with atrial fibrillation.
Article in ARYA atherosclerosis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The efficacy and safety of cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and its prevalence increases with advancing age. Pulmonary vein isolation is a standard approach in drug refractory paroxysmal AF which could be performed by cryoballoon ablation (CBA). We tried to evaluate its efficacy and safety in Iranian patients with AF.
methodsFrom 2015 to 2017, 97 patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF were enrolled in our observational historical cohort study. They were visited 1 and 6 months post-procedure in order to assess the efficacy (recurrence) and safety. Recurrence was defined as 30 seconds of arrhythmia on their 48-hours Holter monitoring.
resultsNinety-seven patients enrolled in the study, 64 (66.0%) of them were men, and their mean age was 55 ± 12 years. Hypertension was reported in 41 patients (42.3%), as the most common cardiac risk factor. 71 patients (73.2%) patients with paroxysmal AF and 15 patients (15.5%) with persistent AF underwent the procedure. After 6 months, recurrence was documented in only 17 patients (17.5%), and 82.5% of the patients were free from the recurrence. Post-procedural complication was detected only in 3 patients (3.1%).
conclusionIn our study, the mid-term success and safety of CBA in patients with paroxysmal AF was showed. CBA is a safe and effective method in paroxysmal AF, and even in some cases with persistent AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.