Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31143148›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2019

Neural Correlates of Simulated Driving While Performing a Secondary Task: A Review.

Massimiliano Palmiero, Laura Piccardi, Maddalena Boccia, Francesca Baralla, Pierluigi Cordellieri, Roberto Sgalla, Umberto Guidoni, Anna Maria Giannini

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. GPS Digital Nudge to Limit Road Crashes in Non-Expert Drivers.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An interrater reliability study of gait analysis systems with the dual task paradigm in healthy young and older adults.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2021
    Article
  8. Regulating Road Rage.Social and personality psychology compass · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Massimiliano PalmieroNeuropsychology Unit, I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Laura PiccardiNeuropsychology Unit, I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Maddalena BocciaNeuropsychology Unit, I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Francesca BarallaDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences 'Vincenzo Tiberio', University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Pierluigi CordellieriDepartment of Psychology, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Roberto SgallaMinistry of Interior, Department of Public Security, Rome, Italy.
Umberto GuidoniANIA Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Anna Maria GianniniDepartment of Psychology, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distracted driving consists in performing a secondary task while driving, such as cell-phone conversation. Given the limited resources of the attentional system, engaging in a secondary task while driving increases the risk to have car accidents. The secondary task engagement while driving can depend on or be affected by different factors, including driver's individual characteristics, necessities, environmental conditions, and so forth. In the present work, the neuroimaging studies that investigated the brain areas involved in simulated driving during the execution of a secondary task (visual and overall auditory tasks) were reviewed in light of driving settings. In general, although there are also differences in decrease and increase brain activations across studies, due to the varieties of paradigms used (simulators, secondary tasks and neuroimaging techniques), the dual-task condition (simulated driving plus secondary task), as compared to the simulated driving-alone condition, was generally found to yield a significant shift in activations from occipital to fronto-parietal brain regions. These findings show that when a secondary task is added during driving the neural system redirects attentional resources away from visual processing, increasing the possibility of incorrect, dangerous or risky behavioral responses. The shift of the attentional resources can occur even if driving behavior is not explicitly affected. Limits of the neuroimaging studies reviewed and future research directions, including the need to explore the role of personality factors in the modulation of the neural programs while engaging distracted driving, are briefly discussed.

Indexed as

attentionaudiodistracted drivinglanguagepreventionvisual

Identifiers

PMID31143148
PMCPMC6521777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.