Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31143002›Full record

ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology

Comparative evaluation of two antibacterial-coated resorbable sutures versus noncoated resorbable sutures in periodontal flap surgery: A clinico-microbiological study.

Prerna Ashok Karde, Kunal Sunder Sethi, Swapna Arunkumar Mahale, Alefiya Shabbir Mamajiwala, Aishwarya Madhukar Kale, Chaitanya Pradeep Joshi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Drug Eluting Sutures.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Prerna Ashok KardeDepartment of Periodontics, MGV's KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik 422 003, Maharashtra, India.
Kunal Sunder SethiDepartment of Periodontics, MGV's KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik 422 003, Maharashtra, India.
Swapna Arunkumar MahaleDepartment of Periodontics, MGV's KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik 422 003, Maharashtra, India.
Alefiya Shabbir MamajiwalaDepartment of Periodontics, MGV's KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik 422 003, Maharashtra, India.
Aishwarya Madhukar KaleDepartment of Periodontics, MGV's KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik 422 003, Maharashtra, India.
Chaitanya Pradeep JoshiInstitute of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, AB25 2ZR, Scotland.
Karmaveer Bhausaheb Hiray Dental College and Hospital · INUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSutures at the surgical site can act as a reservoir for microbes, leading to surgical site infection. This mainly occurs in braided sutures due to wicking action. The use of triclosan-coated suture (TCS) or chlorhexidine-coated suture (CCS) could be one of the possible alternatives to reduce the microbial load.

objectivesThe study was designed to assess the antibacterial efficacy of resorbable TCS and CCS along with its effect on healing after periodontal flap surgery in comparison to noncoated sutures (NCSs). MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty patients with chronic periodontitis indicated for periodontal flap surgery satisfying inclusion criteria were randomly assigned in the three groups: (1) NCS-polyglycolic acid sutures (control group), (2) TCS-polyglycolic acid sutures (experimental Group A), and (3) CCS-polyglycolic acid sutures (experimental Group B). All the patients were evaluated at day 0 (baseline), day 8, day 15, and day 30 for healing index (HI), postoperative pain (POP), and visible plaque index (VPI). Aerobic and anaerobic bacterial growth around each suture was evaluated after day 8. Two randomly chosen samples from each group were examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) for the presence of biofilm.

resultsAlthough intergroup HI and POP were statistically insignificant (

conclusionTCS or CCS sutures can be used in periodontal surgeries to reduce the bacterial load at the surgical sites.

Indexed as

Antibacterial sutureschlorhexidine-coated sutureschronic periodontitisflap surgerytriclosan-coated sutures

Identifiers

PMID31143002
PMCPMC6519104
OpenAlexW2943823838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.