Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31142947›Full record

Trial reportIndian journal of pharmacology

Efficacy of oral terbinafine versus itraconazole in treatment of dermatophytic infection of skin - A prospective, randomized comparative study.

Anuradha Bhatia, Bimal Kanish, Dinesh Kumar Badyal, Prajakta Kate, Swati Choudhary

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indian journal of pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Emerging antifungal resistance inEmerging microbes & infections · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. New thymol-derived triazole exhibits promising activity against Trichophyton rubrum.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Emerging Antifungal Targets and Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tinea corporis: an updated review.Drugs in context · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anuradha BhatiaDepartment of Dermatology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Bimal KanishDepartment of Dermatology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Dinesh Kumar BadyalDepartment of Pharmacology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Prajakta KateDepartment of Dermatology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Swati ChoudharyDepartment of Pharmacology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Christian Medical College & Hospital · INChristian Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDermatophytic infections are the common fungal infections aggravated by hot and humid climate. Terbinafine and itraconazole are commonly used oral antifungal agents for the same. However, resistance to these drugs is being seen increasingly when used in the conventional doses and duration. Therefore, this study was designed to compare the efficacy of terbinafine and itraconazole in increased dosages and duration in the treatment of tinea corporis and tinea cruris. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this randomized comparative study, patients of tinea cruris and tinea corporis were randomly divided into two groups of 160 each and were given oral terbinafine (Group I) and oral itraconazole (Group II) for 4 weeks. The scores and percentage change in scores of pruritus, scaling, and erythema were evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks.

resultsAt the end of week 4, mycological cure was seen in 91.8% after 4 weeks in the itraconazole group as compared to 74.3% of patients in the terbinafine group. There was a significant improvement in percentage change in pruritus, scaling, and erythema in both the groups from 0 to 4 weeks. On comparing groups, the percentage change was significantly different in scaling from 0 to 2 weeks (5.4 vs. -4.8) and 2-4 weeks (16.7 vs. 29.6) between Group I and Group II, respectively. Clinical global improvement was better with itraconazole. Mild adverse effects such as gastrointestinal upset, headache, and taste disturbances were observed which were comparable in both the groups.

conclusionsItraconazole and terbinafine seem to be equally effective and safe in the treatment of tinea cruris and tinea corporis.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAntifungal AgentsErythemaFemaleHumansItraconazoleMaleMiddle AgedPruritusTerbinafineTineaTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntifungal AgentsItraconazoleTerbinafineEfficacyitraconazoleterbinafinetinea corporistinea cruris

Identifiers

PMID31142947
PMCPMC6533924
OpenAlexW2945199169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.