Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31142908›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry

Sample attrition rate of a community study: An analysis of Lucknow urban and rural elderly follow-up over a period of 9 years.

Bhupendra Singh, Nisha Mani Pandey, R K Garg, Neera Kohli, Kausar Usman, G G Agarwal, Sarvada Chandra Tiwari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bhupendra SinghDepartment of Geriatric Mental Health, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Nisha Mani PandeyDepartment of Geriatric Mental Health, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
R K GargDepartment of Neurology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Neera KohliDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Kausar UsmanDepartment of Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
G G AgarwalDepartment of Statistics, Lucknow University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sarvada Chandra TiwariDepartment of Geriatric Mental Health, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLongitudinal/follow-up studies of older adults are a tough task as sample attrition rates due to mortality and other factors may be high in this particular group. However, such studies are very much needed to assess the outcome of health status as well as explore preventive, protective, interventional aspects, as well as risk factors. Given this, a follow-up study was planned and carried out.

aimTo discuss the rate of sample loss as well as the reasons over 9 years.

methodsAn Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) supported follow-up study of urban and rural elderly was done during June, 2016-May, 2017; these subjects were studied in 2007-09 through two independent ICMR supported studies. Similar methodology and assessment tools were applied in these studies. During follow-up a semi structured proforma was developed to get the information of study cohort, obtained data was analyzed and presented applying percentage statistics.

resultsThe sample attrition rate was reported to be comparatively high in urban 52.1% (n= 633) cohort than their rural counterparts 36.3% (n= 457).

conclusionOver a period of 9 years chances of cohort loss due to mortality is about 32%-35%.

Indexed as

Baselinecause of deathelderlyfollow-uphealth statussample attrition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.