Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31142906›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry

Depression in caregivers of patients with breast cancer: A cross-sectional study from a cancer research center in South India.

Sreeja Sahadevan, Vasudevan Namboodiri

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Depression Among the Caregivers of Breast Cancer Patients and its Association with the Quality of Life.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sreeja SahadevanDepartment of Psychiatry, MOSC Medical College, Kolenchery, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.
Vasudevan NamboodiriDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute for Mind and Brain, Thrissur, Kerala, India.
Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church Medical College Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextExisting literature suggests an alarming rate of depression in cancer caregivers, which is comparable to or even higher than in patients themselves. There are no studies on depression among caregivers of breast cancer from India.

aimsThe aim is to study the prevalence and determinants of depression in caregivers of breast cancer. SETTINGS AND

designThis is a cross-sectional study of 384 patient-caregiver dyads at a cancer research center in South India. MATERIALS AND

methodsBased on the International Classification of Diseases, 10

resultsThe prevalence of depression in caregivers was 52.5%. Among them, 35% had mild depression, 16% had moderate depression, and 2% had severe depression. Spousal caregivers, those who resided with the patient, those providing financial support and those with noncaring domestic responsibilities appeared as vulnerable determinants in univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis did not support the same.

conclusionDepression is common among caregivers of patients with breast cancer. There is a need for focused interventions for this group, which may improve the outcome of the patient as well.

Indexed as

Breast cancercaregiverdepressionHamilton rating scale for depressionSouth India

Identifiers

PMID31142906
PMCPMC6532457
OpenAlexW2946429005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.