Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31142815›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Maternal cosmetics use during pregnancy and risks of adverse outcomes: a prospective cohort study.

Huixia Li, Jianfei Zheng, Hua Wang, Guangwen Huang, Qun Huang, Na Feng, Juan Xiao

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Management of Acne in Pregnancy.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Personal-Care Cosmetic Practices in Pakistan: Current Perspectives and Management.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Huixia LiDepartment of Child Health Care, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Jianfei ZhengDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China.
Hua WangNHC Key Laboratory of Birth Defects Research, Prevention and Treatment, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, China. wanghsfy@163.com.
Guangwen HuangDepartment of Child Health Care, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, China. a5413603a@163.com.
Qun HuangDepartment of Child Health Care, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Na FengDepartment of Health Care, Shenzhen Nanshan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Shenzhen, 518067, Guangdong Province, China.
Juan XiaoDepartment of Child Health Care, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, China.
Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNSecond Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CNShenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To probe into the associations between maternal personal cosmetics use during pregnancy and risk of adverse outcomes, and explore the potential dose-response relationships, we carried out a prospective cohort study involving 9710 pregnant women in Zhuzhou City and Xiangtan City in Hunan province during 2016-2017. A structured questionnaire was used to collection information for the pregnant women and their pregnancy outcomes. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by binary or multinomial logistic regressions. The study population included 4652 (47.9%) cosmetics non-users and 5058 (52.1%) cosmetics users. Cosmetics use was associated with an increased risk of small for gestational age (SGA) (aOR = 1.23, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.44), compared with cosmetics non-users. A positive dose-response relationship between frequency of cosmetics use and SGA was observed, although a borderline association was found at low use frequency (1-2 times per week; aOR = 1.18, 95%CI 0.99 to 1.40) and moderate use frequency (3-4 times per week; aOR = 1.23, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.64). High-frequency of cosmetics use (≥5 times per week) was significantly correlated with a higher risk of SGA (aOR = 1.83, 95%CI 1.25 to 2.69). No significant association between personal cosmetics use and the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, macrosomia, or large for gestational age was observed. The present study suggests that personal cosmetics use will increase the risk of SGA, but further research is required to determine which cosmetic products may account for the higher risk of SGA.

Indexed as

Infant, Small for Gestational AgeAdultChinaCosmeticsFemaleFetal MacrosomiaHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal ExposurePregnancyPremature BirthPrevalenceProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCosmetics

Identifiers

PMID31142815
PMCPMC6541712
OpenAlexW2947085182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.