Article in Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Shirin S JenkinsDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Steven GoreDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Xiaoge GuoDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Jie LiuDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Christopher EdeDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Xavier VeauteCEA, CIGEx, F-92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Sue Jinks-RobertsonDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Stephen C KowalczykowskiDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Wolf-Dietrich HeyerDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616 wdheyer@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7774-1953
Funding
Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Gina M Dayton · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
RECOMBINATIONAL MECHANISMS OF DNA REPAIR IN EUKARYOTESR01GM058015 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HEYER, WOLF-DIETRICH · 2000 to 2025
$8.8M
Single-molecule Visualization and Mechanisms of DNA Recombination and Intersecting DNA TransactionsR35GM131900 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Stephen Charles Kowalczykowski · 2019 to 2026
$6.6M
Regulation of Recombinational DNA RepairR01CA092276 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HEYER, WOLF-DIETRICH · 2001 to 2020
$5.2M
Regulation of mitotic genome stability in yeast.R35GM118077 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 2016 to 2023
$4.5M
Single-Molecule Assembly of Protein-DNA ComplexesR01GM064745 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KOWALCZYKOWSKI, STEPHEN CHARLES · 2002 to 2018
$4.3M
REGULATION OF MITOTIC RECOMBINATION IN YEASTR01GM038464 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 1992 to 2015
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Role of the Srs2-Rad51 Interaction Domain in Crossover Control in · full record | OpenQuestion