Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31142576›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2019

Graph Algorithms for Condensing and Consolidating Gene Set Analysis Results.

Sara R Savage, Zhiao Shi, Yuxing Liao, Bing Zhang

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Heterogeneous network approaches to protein pathway prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara R SavageLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Zhiao ShiLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Yuxing LiaoLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Bing ZhangLester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: bing.zhang@bcm.edu.
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

iPGDAC, An Integrative Proteogenomic Data Analysis Center for CPTACU24CA210954 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ZHANG, BING · 2016 to 2020
$4.9M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene set analysis plays a critical role in the functional interpretation of omics data. Although this is typically done for one omics experiment at a time, there is an increasing need to combine gene set analysis results from multiple experiments performed on the same or different omics platforms, such as in multi-omics studies. Integrating results from multiple experiments is challenging, and annotation redundancy between gene sets further obscures clear conclusions. We propose to use a weighted set cover algorithm to reduce redundancy of gene sets identified in a single experiment. Next, we use affinity propagation to consolidate similar gene sets identified from multiple experiments into clusters and to automatically determine the most representative gene set for each cluster. Using three examples from over representation analysis and gene set enrichment analysis, we showed that weighted set cover outperformed a previously published set cover method and reduced the number of gene sets by 52-77%. Focusing on overlapping genes between the list of input genes and the enriched gene sets in over-representation analysis and leading-edge genes in gene set enrichment analysis further reduced the number of gene sets. A use case combining enrichment analysis results from RNA-Seq and proteomics data comparing basal and luminal A breast cancer samples highlighted the known difference in proliferation and DNA damage response. Finally, we used these algorithms for a pan-cancer survival analysis. Our analysis clearly revealed prognosis-related pathways common to multiple cancer types or specific to individual cancer types, as well as pathways associated with prognosis in different directions in different cancer types. We implemented these two algorithms in an R package, Sumer, which generates tables and static and interactive plots for exploration and publication. Sumer is publicly available at https://github.com/bzhanglab/sumer.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsHumansNeoplasm ProteinsRNA-SeqNeoplasm ProteinsAlgorithmsBioinformatics softwareBreast cancerCancer Biology*Computational BiologyData evaluationNetworks*OmicsPathway Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31142576
PMCPMC6692773
OpenAlexW2947990714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.