ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2019
A Meta-proteogenomic Approach to Peptide Identification Incorporating Assembly Uncertainty and Genomic Variation.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topological deep learning for enhancing peptide-protein complex prediction.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
- MetaProD: A Highly-Configurable Mass Spectrometry Analyzer for Multiplexed Proteomic and Metaproteomic Data.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- IntroSpect: Motif-Guided Immunopeptidome Database Building Tool to Improve the Sensitivity of HLA I Binding Peptide Identification by Mass Spectrometry.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- The Intestinal Microbiota May Be a Potential Theranostic Tool for Personalized Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Using high-abundance proteins as guides for fast and effective peptide/protein identification from human gut metaproteomic data.Microbiome · 2021Article
- Why Consumers Prefer Green Friariello Pepper: Changes in the Protein and Metabolite Profiles Along the Ripening.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Methods for Proteogenomics Data Analysis, Challenges, and Scalability Bottlenecks: A Survey.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021Article
- Soil Metaproteomics for the Study of the Relationships Between Microorganisms and Plants: A Review of Extraction Protocols and Ecological Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Proteomics Is Not an Island: Multi-omics Integration Is the Key to Understanding Biological Systems.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Matching metagenomic and/or metatranscriptomic data, currently often under-used, can be useful reference for metaproteomic tandem mass spectra (MS/MS) data analysis. Here we developed a software pipeline for identification of peptides and proteins from metaproteomic MS/MS data using proteins derived from matching metagenomic (and metatranscriptomic) data as the search database, based on two novel approaches Graph2Pro (published) and Var2Pep (new). Graph2Pro retains and uses uncertainties of metagenome assembly for reference-based MS/MS data analysis. Var2Pep considers the variations found in metagenomic/metatranscriptomic sequencing reads that are not retained in the assemblies (contigs). The new software pipeline provides one stop application of both tools, and it supports the use of metagenome assembly from commonly used assemblers including MegaHit and metaSPAdes. When tested on two collections of multi-omic microbiome data sets, our pipeline significantly improved the identification rate of the metaproteomic MS/MS spectra by about two folds, comparing to conventional contig- or read-based approaches (the Var2Pep alone identified 5.6% to 24.1% more unique peptides, depending on the data set). We also showed that identified variant peptides are important for functional profiling of microbiomes. All results suggested that it is important to take into consideration of the assembly uncertainties and genomic variants to facilitate metaproteomic MS/MS data interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.