Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31142535›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Factors associated with the responsive behaviours of older adults living in long-term care homes towards staff: a systematic review protocol.

Yuting Song, Matthias Hoben, Lori Weeks, Anne-Marie Boström, Zahra S Goodarzi, Janet Squires, Helen Doan, Adrian Wagg, R Colin Reid, Carole Estabrooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuting SongFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Matthias HobenFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lori WeeksSchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Anne-Marie BoströmFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9421-3941
Zahra S GoodarziDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Janet SquiresSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Helen DoanFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Adrian WaggDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
R Colin ReidFaculty of Health and Social Development, School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Carole EstabrooksFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the last decade, increasing research interest has been expressed in responsive behaviours of older adults living in long-term care (LTC) homes, including nursing homes and assisted living facilities. Responsive behaviours are not only a sign of underlying unmet needs, but when directed against (towards) paid staff can lead to decreased quality of work life, and may contribute to lower quality of care. In this systematic review, we aim to synthesise empirically based quantitative and qualitative evidence on factors and stakeholder (eg, staff and family members) experiences of factors associated with the responsive behaviours of people living in LTC directed towards staff. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be a systematic review of published and 'grey' literature. Twelve bibliographical databases will be searched, and for each database, we will use appropriate subject headings and keywords that cover two concepts: LTC and responsive behaviour. No publication date or language filter will be used. The title and abstract of each extracted record will be screened, followed by screening of full text of included papers. Then data extraction and quality assessments will be undertaken. Each stage will be completed independently by pairs of authors. For quantitative studies, meta-analysis will be conducted if pooling is possible; otherwise, a critical narrative analysis will be conducted. For qualitative studies, thematic analysis will be conducted. Factors will then be organised at the individual, interpersonal, institutional and larger societal levels. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to explore the influence of risk of bias and publication bias on the results. Subgroup analysis will be conducted for people who live with dementia and those who do not. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review. The results of this study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at professional conferences.

Indexed as

Assisted Living FacilitiesHomes for the AgedNursing HomesProfessional-Patient RelationsAgedAggressionCanadaDementiaHumansLong-Term CareSystematic Reviews as Topicdementialong-term careresponsive behaviorssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31142535
PMCPMC6549641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.