Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31142534›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Engaging primary care physicians in system change - an interpretive qualitative study in a remote and rural health region in Northern British Columbia, Canada.

David Snadden, Trish Reay, Neil Hanlon, Martha MacLeod

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Partnering for change.Journal of health organization and management · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David SnaddenDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Northern Medical Program, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4818-1184
Trish ReaySchool of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Neil HanlonGeography, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada.
Martha MacLeodNursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4174-6381

Funding

CIHR MOP 114987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe how physicians were engaged in primary healthcare system change in a remote and rural Canadian health authority.

designA qualitative interpretive study based on a hermeneutic approach.

methods34 transcribed in-depth interviews with physicians and administrators relevant to physician engagement were purposively sampled from a larger data set of 239 interviews gathered over a 3-year period from seven communities engaged in primary healthcare transformation. Interviews were coded and analysed interpretively to develop common themes.

settingThis research is part of a larger study, Partnering for Change I, which investigated the efforts of Northern Health, a rural regional health authority in British Columbia, to transform its healthcare system to one grounded in primary care with a focus on interdisciplinary teams. It reports how physician engagement was accomplished during the first 3 years of the study.

participantsInterviews with 34 individuals with direct involvement and experience in the processes of physician engagement. These included 10 physicians, three Regional Executives, 18 Primary Healthcare coordinators and three Division of Family Practice leads.

resultsThree major interconnected themes that depicted the process of engagement were identified: working through tensions constructively, drawing on structures for engagement and facilitating relationships.

conclusionsPhysician engagement was recognised as a priority by Northern Health in its efforts to create system change. This was facilitated by the creation of Divisions of Family Practice that provided a structure for dialogue and facilitated a common voice for physicians. Divisions helped to build trust between various groups through allowing constructive conversations to surface and deal with tensions. Local context mattered. Flexibility in working from local priorities was a critical part of developing relationships that facilitated the design and implementation of system reform.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPhysicians, Primary CareRural HealthRural Health ServicesBritish ColumbiaHealth Care ReformHumansInterviews as TopicPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchcommunity health planning/methodscommunity-institutional relationsphysician engagementprimary carequalitative methodsrural health services

Identifiers

PMID31142534
PMCPMC6549631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.