Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31142379›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2019

Concordance of the point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen test for the diagnosis of intestinal schistosomiasis in a low endemicity area.

Sergei Rodrigo Magalhães de Sousa, Isabelle Helena Lima Dias, Álvaro Luan Santana Fonseca, Bianca Rodrigues Contente, Joyce Favacho Cardoso Nogueira, Tatyellen Natasha da Costa Oliveira, Stefan Michael Geiger, Martin Johannes Enk

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence Mapping ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sergei Rodrigo Magalhães de SousaPrograma de Pós-Graduação Strictu Sensu em Biologia Parasitária na Amazônia da Universidade do Estado do Pará, Tv. Perebebuí, 2623 - Marco, Belém, PA, 66087, Brazil. rodrigo.bio.uepa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2197-7323
Isabelle Helena Lima DiasPrograma de Pós-Graduação Strictu Sensu em Biologia Parasitária na Amazônia da Universidade do Estado do Pará, Tv. Perebebuí, 2623 - Marco, Belém, PA, 66087, Brazil.
Álvaro Luan Santana FonsecaPrograma de Pós-Graduação Strictu Sensu em Biologia Parasitária na Amazônia da Universidade do Estado do Pará, Tv. Perebebuí, 2623 - Marco, Belém, PA, 66087, Brazil.
Bianca Rodrigues ContentePrograma de Pós-Graduação Strictu Sensu em Biologia Parasitária na Amazônia da Universidade do Estado do Pará, Tv. Perebebuí, 2623 - Marco, Belém, PA, 66087, Brazil.
Joyce Favacho Cardoso NogueiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação Strictu Sensu em Biologia Parasitária na Amazônia da Universidade do Estado do Pará, Tv. Perebebuí, 2623 - Marco, Belém, PA, 66087, Brazil.
Tatyellen Natasha da Costa OliveiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação Strictu Sensu em Biologia Parasitária na Amazônia da Universidade do Estado do Pará, Tv. Perebebuí, 2623 - Marco, Belém, PA, 66087, Brazil.
Stefan Michael GeigerDepartamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Martin Johannes EnkPrograma de Pós-Graduação Strictu Sensu em Biologia Parasitária na Amazônia da Universidade do Estado do Pará, Tv. Perebebuí, 2623 - Marco, Belém, PA, 66087, Brazil.
Universidade do Estado do Pará · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Pará (BR) 0042017Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação MCTI/CNPq/MS-SCTIE-Decit n 40/2012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Kato-Katz technique is recommended worldwide for the diagnosis of intestinal schistosomiasis, detecting parasite eggs in feces of infected people. However, new tests have been developed in order to facilitate diagnosis, e.g. by detection of specific antigens secreted by schistosomes, such as the circulating cathodic antigen (CCA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen test (POC-CCA) compared to the Kato-Katz technique in a low prevalence area in the Amazon Region, located in the municipality of Primavera, State of Pará, Brazil.

methodsPositivity rates of the POC-CCA test and the Kato-Katz technique were calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and kappa coefficient were determined by comparing both methods. The reference standard was established using 16 Kato-Katz slides, 12 of the first fecal sample, two of the second and two of the third one. The study also included the concordance between POC-CCA results and different numbers and combinations of Kato-Katz slides.

resultsThe prevalence of schistosomiasis according to the reference standard or POC-CCA test reached a rate of 9.4% or 23.9%, respectively, among a total of 372 participants. The positivity rates by the Kato-Katz technique increased from 2.4 to 9.4%, according to the increase in the number of slides examined and fecal samples collected. A sensitivity of 55.6%, specificity 76.9%, accuracy 76% and κ coefficient of 0.06 was observed by comparing one slide of the first sample and POC-CCA. Comparing 6 slides from three different samples, two slides of each, with POC-CCA resulted in a sensitivity of 58.3%, specificity 78.4%, accuracy 77% and κ coefficient of 0.16. Finally, the comparison of 16 slides from three different samples with POC-CCA revealed a sensitivity of 65.7%, specificity 80.4%, accuracy 79%, and κ coefficient of 0.27.

conclusionsThe immunochromatographic test has the potential to be an important tool to combat schistosomiasis because of its practicality and applicability but should be applied with caution in low prevalence areas and in programs that aim to eliminate this disease.

trial registrationCAAE#21824513.9.0000.5091 . January 31st, 2014.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsAntigens, HelminthBrazilChildFecesFemaleHumansImmunoassayMaleMiddle AgedPoint-of-Care SystemsSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasis mansoniAntigens, HelminthAccuracyDiagnosisKato-KatzLow prevalence areaPOC-CCASchistosoma mansoni

Identifiers

PMID31142379
PMCPMC6542115
OpenAlexW2947994632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.