Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31142301›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

Pharmacist-led teaching as a longitudinal theme for medical school curriculums - a solution for reducing prescribing errors in junior doctors?

Naomi Lloyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Naomi LloydSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Merseyside, UK. hlnlloyd@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2519-3414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medication errors are a significant problem faced by health services internationally.Prescribing errors are a common preventable source of morbidity and mortality, and as such it is our duty as healthcare professionals to minimise them as much as possible.Many prescriptions, and errors, are written by junior doctors. Which raises the question of whether the medical school curriculum could be changed to better prepare students for prescribing.There is a great deal of evidence in the literature describing how pharmacist-led teaching in later years of medical school has a beneficial effect on the quality of prescriptions written by junior doctors. In addition, this style of teaching leads to a reduction in the number of prescribing errors that occur. However, many of these papers still reported that students were still apprehensive about their prescriptions after the teaching programmes, and a number of their prescriptions still contained some inaccuracies.The University of Liverpool organises 'Safe Prescribing' teaching sessions during years 3-5 of the undergraduate medical curriculum. This programme consistently receives positive feedback and results in students feeling more comfortable and confident in a variety of prescribing scenarios.Incorporating pharmacist-led teaching as a longitudinal theme from the early stages of medical school is one way positive habits can be built and reinforced. This may in turn reduce the number of prescribing errors that occur, both in junior doctors and more senior doctors as these clinicians progress through their training armed with an effective skill set.

Indexed as

PharmacistsCurriculumEducation, MedicalHumansMedical Staff, HospitalMedication ErrorsTeachingDoctorErrorsJuniorPharmacistPrescribingStructuredTeaching

Identifiers

PMID31142301
PMCPMC6542051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.