Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31142264›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Identifying lncRNA-mediated regulatory modules via ChIA-PET network analysis.

Denise Thiel, Nataša Djurdjevac Conrad, Evgenia Ntini, Ria X Peschutter, Heike Siebert, Annalisa Marsico

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Denise ThielMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Ihnestraße 63-73, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
Nataša Djurdjevac ConradZuse Institute Berlin (ZIB), Takustraße 7, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
Evgenia NtiniMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Ihnestraße 63-73, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
Ria X PeschutterMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Ihnestraße 63-73, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
Heike SiebertDepartment of Mathematics and Informatics, Freie Universität, Berlin, Arnimallee 7, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
Annalisa MarsicoMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Ihnestraße 63-73, Berlin, 14195, Germany. marsico@molgen.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEZuse Institute Berlin · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE) MA 4454/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough several studies have provided insights into the role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), the majority of them have unknown function. Recent evidence has shown the importance of both lncRNAs and chromatin interactions in transcriptional regulation. Although network-based methods, mainly exploiting gene-lncRNA co-expression, have been applied to characterize lncRNA of unknown function by means of 'guilt-by-association', no strategy exists so far which identifies mRNA-lncRNA functional modules based on the 3D chromatin interaction graph.

resultsTo better understand the function of chromatin interactions in the context of lncRNA-mediated gene regulation, we have developed a multi-step graph analysis approach to examine the RNA polymerase II ChIA-PET chromatin interaction network in the K562 human cell line. We have annotated the network with gene and lncRNA coordinates, and chromatin states from the ENCODE project. We used centrality measures, as well as an adaptation of our previously developed Markov State Models (MSM) clustering method, to gain a better understanding of lncRNAs in transcriptional regulation. The novelty of our approach resides in the detection of fuzzy regulatory modules based on network properties and their optimization based on co-expression analysis between genes and gene-lncRNA pairs. This results in our method returning more bona fide regulatory modules than other state-of-the art approaches for clustering on graphs.

conclusionsInterestingly, we find that lncRNA network hubs tend to be significantly enriched in evolutionary conserved lncRNAs and enhancer-like functions. We validated regulatory functions for well known lncRNAs, such as MALAT1 and the enhancer-like lncRNA FALEC. In addition, by investigating the modular structure of bigger components we mine putative regulatory functions for uncharacterized lncRNAs.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsChromatinGene Expression RegulationHumansK562 CellsRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, RNAChromatinRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, MessengerChIA-PETGene regulationlncRNAModulesNetwork analysis

Identifiers

PMID31142264
PMCPMC6540383
OpenAlexW2953010272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.