Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31141973›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review.

Armelle M Ngueleu, Andréanne K Blanchette, Désirée Maltais, Hélène Moffet, Bradford J McFadyen, Laurent Bouyer, Charles S Batcho

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06410755 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Research on Evaluation of Home-based Rehabilitation Monitoring System With Wearable Devices and Self-Report Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsGait Disorders, NeurologicArmsIntegrated Wearable devices Monitoring sys-Assisted Home Rehabilitation Program
NCT06461923 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Development and Feasibility Study of the Home-based Gait Rehabilitation Service by Using the Insole-type Gait Analysis Device for Children With Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsGait Disorders, Neurologic, Cerebral PalsyArmsInsole wearing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Armelle M NgueleuCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC G1M2S8, Canada. armelle.ngueleu.1@ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0024-7639
Andréanne K BlanchetteCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC G1M2S8, Canada. andreanne.blanchette@fmed.ulaval.ca.
Désirée MaltaisCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC G1M2S8, Canada. Desiree.Maltais@rea.ulaval.ca.
Hélène MoffetCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC G1M2S8, Canada. Helene.Moffet@rea.ulaval.ca.
Bradford J McFadyenCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC G1M2S8, Canada. Brad.McFadyen@fmed.ulaval.ca.
Laurent BouyerCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC G1M2S8, Canada. Laurent.Bouyer@rea.ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2034-4516
Charles S BatchoCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC G1M2S8, Canada. charles.batcho@fmed.ulaval.ca.

Funding

MEDTEQ and MITACS, Quebec, Canada IT07003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growing interest in daily activity monitoring, several insole designs have been developed to identify postures, detect activities, and count steps. However, the validity of these devices is not clearly established. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the available information on the criterion validity of instrumented insoles in detecting postures activities and steps. The literature search through six databases led to 33 articles that met inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated 17 different insole models and involved 290 participants from 16 to 75 years old. Criterion validity was assessed using six statistical indicators. For posture and activity recognition, accuracy varied from 75.0% to 100%, precision from 65.8% to 100%, specificity from 98.1% to 100%, sensitivity from 73.0% to 100%, and identification rate from 66.2% to 100%. For step counting, accuracies were very high (94.8% to 100%). Across studies, different postures and activities were assessed using different criterion validity indicators, leading to heterogeneous results. Instrumented insoles appeared to be highly accurate for steps counting. However, measurement properties were variable for posture and activity recognition. These findings call for a standardized methodology to investigate the measurement properties of such devices.

Indexed as

criterion validityinsolesposture and activity recognitionstep counting

Identifiers

PMID31141973
PMCPMC6603748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.