Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31141904›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Process-Oriented Feedback through Process Mining for Surgical Procedures in Medical Training: The Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter Placement Case.

Ricardo Lira, Juan Salas-Morales, Luis Leiva, Rene de la Fuente, Ricardo Fuentes, Alejandro Delfino, Claudia Hurtado Nazal, Marcos Sepúlveda, Michael Arias, Valeria Herskovic and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mapping the Patient's Journey in Healthcare through Process Mining.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricardo LiraDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile. rlira2@uc.cl.
Juan Salas-MoralesDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile. jisalas1@uc.cl.
Luis LeivaDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile. lileiva@uc.cl.
Rene de la FuenteDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile. rdelafue@med.puc.cl.ORCID 0000-0001-7187-3405
Ricardo FuentesDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile. rfuente@med.puc.cl.ORCID 0000-0002-3030-3622
Alejandro DelfinoDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile. aedelfin@med.puc.cl.
Claudia Hurtado NazalDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile. cehurtado@uc.cl.
Marcos SepúlvedaDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile. marcos@ing.puc.cl.ORCID 0000-0002-9467-7666
Michael AriasDepartment of Business Computer Science, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Ramón 111-4250, Costa Rica. michael.arias_c@ucr.ac.cr.ORCID 0000-0003-1014-342X
Valeria HerskovicDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile. vherskov@ing.puc.cl.ORCID 0000-0002-2650-6507
Jorge Munoz-GamaDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile. jmun@uc.cl.ORCID 0000-0002-6908-3911
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversidad de Costa Rica · CR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing high levels of competence in the execution of surgical procedures through training is a key factor for obtaining good clinical results in healthcare. To improve the effectiveness of the training, it is advisable to provide feedback to each student tailored to how the student has performed the procedure on each occasion. Current state-of-the-art feedback is based on Checklists and Global Rating Scales, which indicate whether all process steps have been carried out and the quality of each execution step. However, there is a process perspective that is not captured successfully by these instruments, e.g., steps performed, but in an undesired order, group of activities that are repeated an unnecessary number of times, or an excessive transition time between two consecutive steps. In this research, we propose a novel use of process mining techniques to effectively identify desired and undesired process patterns regarding rework, the order in which activities are performed, and time performance, in order to complement the tailored feedback for surgical procedures using a process perspective. The proposed approach was applied to analyze a real case of ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter placement training. It was quantitatively and qualitatively validated that the students who participated in the training program perceived the process-oriented feedback they received as favorable for their learning.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCatheterization, Central VenousCentral Venous CathetersEducational MeasurementHumansInternship and ResidencyUltrasonography, Interventionalfeedbackhealthcaremedical trainingprocess miningsurgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID31141904
PMCPMC6603675
OpenAlexW2946971272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.