Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31141890›Full record

ReviewNutrients2019

The Potential of Carnosine in Brain-Related Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.

Martin Schön, Aya Mousa, Michael Berk, Wern L Chia, Jozef Ukropec, Arshad Majid, Barbara Ukropcová, Barbora de Courten

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Carnosine supplementation improves cognitive outcomes in younger participants of the NEAT trial.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Beta-Alanine Relieves Symptoms in Primary Orthostatic Tremor.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin SchönInstitute of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, 84215 Bratislava, Slovakia. martin.schon01@gmail.com.
Aya MousaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia. aya.mousa@monash.edu.
Michael BerkSchool of Medicine, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia. michael.berk@barwonhealth.org.au.
Wern L ChiaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia. wernchia87@gmail.com.
Jozef UkropecBiomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 81439 Bratislava, Slovakia. jozef.ukropec@savba.sk.
Arshad MajidSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2HQ, UK. arshad.majid@sheffield.ac.uk.
Barbara UkropcováInstitute of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, 84215 Bratislava, Slovakia. barbara.ukropcova@savba.sk.
Barbora de CourtenMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia. barbora.decourten@monash.edu.
Biomedical Research Center of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKMonash University · AUBarwon Health · AUUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja 15-0253National Health and Medical Research Council APP1059660National Health and Medical Research Council APP1156072National Heart Foundation of Australia 100864SAS-MOST JRP 2018/10Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV 2/0107/18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurological, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders represent a serious burden because of their increasing prevalence, risk of disability, and the lack of effective causal/disease-modifying treatments. There is a growing body of evidence indicating potentially favourable effects of carnosine, which is an over-the-counter food supplement, in peripheral tissues. Although most studies to date have focused on the role of carnosine in metabolic and cardiovascular disorders, the physiological presence of this di-peptide and its analogues in the brain together with their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier as well as evidence from in vitro, animal, and human studies suggest carnosine as a promising therapeutic target in brain disorders. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of carnosine in neurological, neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders, summarizing current evidence from cell, animal, and human cross-sectional, longitudinal studies, and randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimalsBrainBrain DiseasesCarnosineCognitionHumansNeuroprotective AgentsCarnosineNeuroprotective Agents-alaninebraincarnosinecognitionL-histidinenervous systemneurologypsychiatrytreatment

Identifiers

PMID31141890
PMCPMC6627134
OpenAlexW2947338824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.