ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019
Does Food Safety Risk Perception Affect the Public's Trust in Their Government? An Empirical Study on a National Survey in China.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Publicly tasting cultivated meat and socially constructing perceived value politics and identity.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- Trust and distrust in public governance settings: Conceptualising and testing the link in regulatory relations.Journal of trust research · 2024Article
- Consumers' Trust in Different Sources of Information Related to Food Hazards and Their Judgment of Government Performance-A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Lockdown, information quality, and political trust: An empirical study of the Shanghai lockdown under COVID-19.International review of administrative sciences · 2023Article
- Food Safety Governance in the Age of COVID-19: How Does Employees' Attitude on Public-Private Governance System Affect Their Willingness to Blow the Whistle on Food Violations?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A study on the influence of product environmental information transparency on online consumers' purchasing behavior of green agricultural products.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Chinese Consumers' Trust in Food Safety Surveillance Sampling of Commonly Consumed Foods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Perception of Occupational and Environmental Risks and Hazards among Mineworkers: A Psychometric Paradigm Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The influencing factors of health-related quality of life among rural hypertensive individuals: a cross-sectional study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Article
- The more actions, the higher the performance evaluation? Evidence from the crisis management of COVID-19 in China.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2021Article
- A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019.Food science & nutrition · 2021Article
- Pathways Improving Compliance with Preventive Behaviors during the Remission Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Digital Technology, Knowledge Level, and Food Safety Governance: Implications for National Healthcare System.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Influence of Interpersonal and Institutional Trust on the Participation Willingness of Farmers in E-Commerce Poverty Alleviation.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Regional Regulations and Public Safety Perceptions of Quality-of-Life Issues: Empirical Study on Food Safety in China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The Influence Mechanism of Reputation Information on the Formation of Safety Trust in Chinese Infant Milk Powder.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Food Safety Trust, Risk Perception, and Consumers' Response to Company Trust Repair Actions in Food Recall Crises.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Korean Consumers' Recognition of Risks Depending on the Provision of Safety Information for Chemical Products.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Association of Internet Use with Attitudes Toward Food Safety in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper studies the impacts of food safety risk perception on the different dimensions of governmental trust. A logistic regression model was constructed based on the multidimensional analysis of government trust (i.e., competence, benevolence and honesty) with food safety risk perception, economic growth, combating corruption, social trust, political participation and demographic characteristics as explanatory variables. The main findings are that respondents with low levels of food risk perception, high political participation and a positive evaluation of economic growth and anti-corruption performance show high levels of trust in government competence, benevolence and honesty. Social trust has a spillover effect, which has a significant impact on government competence and benevolence but has no significant impact on the honesty of the government, which reflects the distinction between different dimensions of the public's trust in their government. Highly educated people have low levels of trust in government competence, high levels of trust in government benevolence, and no significant impact on the judgment of government honesty. In general, the public speak lowly of the status of food safety and have limited interest in political participation. The government is better to strengthen food safety supervision and develop social capital to further enhance the public's governmental trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.