ArticlePhysiological measurement2019
A low-complexity photoplethysmographic systolic peak detector for compressed sensed data.
Article in Physiological measurement, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Admission photoplethysmography-based mortality prediction in hospitalized Ugandan children with suspected or confirmed infection: A feasibility study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Performance analysis of remote photoplethysmography deep filtering using long short-term memory neural network.Biomedical engineering online · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRecent advances in wearable technologies and signal processing have made it possible to perform health monitoring during everyday life activities. Despite the fact that new technologies allow the storage of large volumes of data on small devices, limitations remain when data have to be transmitted or processed with devices with both energy and computational constraints. APPROACH: This work focuses on the implementation and validation of a photoplethysmogram (PPG) low-complexity analysis method for sensors that acquire a compressed PPG signal through compressive sensing (CS) and allows for the accurate detection of the PPG systolic peak in the compressed domain. Three public datasets were used consisting of a total of about 52 h of PPG signals from 600 patients with normal and abnormal rhythms. Peaks were manually annotated by experts or derived from the annotated synchronized ECG. MAIN
resultsThe proposed method achieved a pooled average F1 measure on the three datasets of 91% [Formula: see text] 8% for a 5% compression ratio (CR), 89% [Formula: see text] 10% for CR = 70% and 82% [Formula: see text] 12% for CR of 90%. The pooled average F1 measure on the original uncompressed data using an offline open source peak detector is F1 = 91% [Formula: see text] 11%. The proposed method is up to ∼100 times faster with respect to methods using decompression followed by peak detection. SIGNIFICANCE: Results demonstrate that it is possible to achieve detection performance, in terms of the F1 measure, comparable with those obtained on the original uncompressed and filtered signal, making the proposed approach appropriate for real-time wearable systems with energy and computation constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.