Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31141576›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Molecular and serological surveys of canine distemper virus: A meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies.

Vivaldo Gomes da Costa, Marielena Vogel Saivish, Roger Luiz Rodrigues, Rebeca Francielle de Lima Silva, Marcos Lázaro Moreli, Ricardo Henrique Krüger

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Investigation of the canine distemper virus in dogs living at public kennels in Northern Brazil: validation of a detection assay.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Immuno-chromatography based rapid detection of canine distemper in dogs and its comparison with RT-PCR.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vivaldo Gomes da CostaEnzymology Laboratory, Department of Cell Biology, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9359-0198
Marielena Vogel SaivishVirology Laboratory, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7627-621X
Roger Luiz RodriguesVirology Laboratory, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8042-4636
Rebeca Francielle de Lima SilvaVirology Laboratory, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4637-211X
Marcos Lázaro MoreliVirology Laboratory, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9599-361X
Ricardo Henrique KrügerEnzymology Laboratory, Department of Cell Biology, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanine morbillivirus (canine distemper virus, CDV) persists as a serious threat to the health of domestic dogs and wildlife. Although studies have been conducted on the frequency and risk factors associated with CDV infection, there are no comprehensive data on the current epidemiological magnitude in the domestic dog population at regional and national levels. Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional study and included our results in a meta-analysis to summarize and combine available data on the frequency and potential risk factors associated with CDV infection.

methodsFor the cross-sectional study, biological samples from dogs suspected to have canine distemper (CD) were collected and screened for viral RNA. Briefly, the PRISMA protocol was used for the meta-analysis, and data analyses were performed using STATA IC 13.1 software.

resultsCDV RNA was detected in 34% (48/141) of dogs suspected to have CD. Following our meta-analysis, 53 studies were selected for a total of 11,527 dogs. Overall, the pooled frequency of CDV positivity based on molecular and serological results were 33% (95% CI: 23-43) and 46% (95% CI: 36-57), respectively. The pooled subgroup analyses of clinical signs, types of biological samples, diagnostic methods and dog lifestyle had a wide range of CDV positivity (range 8-75%). Free-ranging dogs (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.05-1.97), dogs >24 months old (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.1-3) and unvaccinated dogs (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.26-6.77) were found to be positively associated with CDV infection. In contrast, dogs <12 months old (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.20-0.64) and dogs with a complete anti-CDV vaccination (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.05-0.59) had a negative association.

conclusionConsidering the high frequency of CDV positivity associated with almost all the variables analyzed in dogs, it is necessary to immediately and continuously plan mitigation strategies to reduce the CDV prevalence, especially in determined endemic localities.

Indexed as

DistemperDistemper Virus, CanineRNA, ViralAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesDogsPrevalenceRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID31141576
PMCPMC6541297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.