ArticleProteins2019
Coupling dynamics and evolutionary information with structure to identify protein regulatory and functional binding sites.
Article in Proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Residue Interaction Network Reveals Allosteric Pathways Linking Orthosteric and Intracellular Sites in Class A GPCRs.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Protein allosteric site identification using machine learning and per amino acid residue reported internal protein nanoenvironment descriptors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Predicting allosteric pockets in protein biological assemblages.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- From Deep Mutational Mapping of Allosteric Protein Landscapes to Deep Learning of Allostery and Hidden Allosteric Sites: Zooming in on "Allosteric Intersection" of Biochemical and Big Data Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Machine learning and protein allostery.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2023Review
- Calculation of centralities in protein kinase A.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- PSP-GNM: Predicting Protein Stability Changes upon Point Mutations with a Gaussian Network Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- ScanNet: an interpretable geometric deep learning model for structure-based protein binding site prediction.Nature methods · 2022Article
- Dissecting mutational allosteric effects in alkaline phosphatases associated with different Hypophosphatasia phenotypes: An integrative computational investigation.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Computational Methods for Predicting Functions at the mRNA Isoform Level.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Essential site scanning analysis: A new approach for detecting sites that modulate the dispersion of protein global motions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Article
- Modeling Electrostatic Force in Protein-Protein Recognition.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Binding sites in proteins can be either specifically functional binding sites (active sites) that bind specific substrates with high affinity or regulatory binding sites (allosteric sites), that modulate the activity of functional binding sites through effector molecules. Owing to their significance in determining protein function, the identification of protein functional and regulatory binding sites is widely acknowledged as an important biological problem. In this work, we present a novel binding site prediction method, Active and Regulatory site Prediction (AR-Pred), which supplements protein geometry, evolutionary, and physicochemical features with information about protein dynamics to predict putative active and allosteric site residues. As the intrinsic dynamics of globular proteins plays an essential role in controlling binding events, we find it to be an important feature for the identification of protein binding sites. We train and validate our predictive models on multiple balanced training and validation sets with random forest machine learning and obtain an ensemble of discrete models for each prediction type. Our models for active site prediction yield a median area under the curve (AUC) of 91% and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.68, whereas the less well-defined allosteric sites are predicted at a lower level with a median AUC of 80% and MCC of 0.48. When tested on an independent set of proteins, our models for active site prediction show comparable performance to two existing methods and gains compared to two others, while the allosteric site models show gains when tested against three existing prediction methods. AR-Pred is available as a free downloadable package at https://github.com/sambitmishra0628/AR-PRED_source.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.