Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31141211›Full record

ArticleProteins2019

Coupling dynamics and evolutionary information with structure to identify protein regulatory and functional binding sites.

Sambit K Mishra, Gaurav Kandoi, Robert L Jernigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Machine learning and protein allostery.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Calculation of centralities in protein kinase A.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Computational Methods for Predicting Functions at the mRNA Isoform Level.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Modeling Electrostatic Force in Protein-Protein Recognition.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sambit K MishraBioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Gaurav KandoiBioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Robert L JerniganBioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0003-0996-8360

Funding

Coarse-Grained Models of ProteinsR01GM072014 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L · 2004 to 2012
$2.3M
Protein Sequence MatchingR01GM127701 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L, KLOCZKOWSKI, ANDRZEJ · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072014NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127701NIH HHS R01-GM72014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binding sites in proteins can be either specifically functional binding sites (active sites) that bind specific substrates with high affinity or regulatory binding sites (allosteric sites), that modulate the activity of functional binding sites through effector molecules. Owing to their significance in determining protein function, the identification of protein functional and regulatory binding sites is widely acknowledged as an important biological problem. In this work, we present a novel binding site prediction method, Active and Regulatory site Prediction (AR-Pred), which supplements protein geometry, evolutionary, and physicochemical features with information about protein dynamics to predict putative active and allosteric site residues. As the intrinsic dynamics of globular proteins plays an essential role in controlling binding events, we find it to be an important feature for the identification of protein binding sites. We train and validate our predictive models on multiple balanced training and validation sets with random forest machine learning and obtain an ensemble of discrete models for each prediction type. Our models for active site prediction yield a median area under the curve (AUC) of 91% and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.68, whereas the less well-defined allosteric sites are predicted at a lower level with a median AUC of 80% and MCC of 0.48. When tested on an independent set of proteins, our models for active site prediction show comparable performance to two existing methods and gains compared to two others, while the allosteric site models show gains when tested against three existing prediction methods. AR-Pred is available as a free downloadable package at https://github.com/sambitmishra0628/AR-PRED_source.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEvolution, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationAlgorithmsAllosteric RegulationAllosteric SiteBinding SitesDatabases, ProteinHumansMachine LearningProtein BindingProteinsProteinsactive sitesallosterycoarse-grainingelastic network modelsmachine learningproteins dynamicsregulatory sites

Identifiers

PMID31141211
PMCPMC6718341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.