Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31141181›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2019

Chiral separation of cathinone derivatives using β-cyclodextrin-assisted capillary electrophoresis-Comparison of four different β-cyclodextrin derivatives used as chiral selectors.

Johannes S Hägele, Eva-Maria Hubner, Martin G Schmid

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interpol Review of Drug Analysis 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johannes S HägeleDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Eva-Maria HubnerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Martin G SchmidDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0055-660X
University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade, more than 100 different cathinone derivatives slopped over entire Europe due to their enormous popularity. Generally, these novel psychoactive substances are easily available via the internet. This fact leads to various social problems, since cathinones are substances with consciousness-changing effects and are mainly misused for recreational matters by their consumers. Cathinones possess a chiral center including two enantiomeric forms with potentially different pharmacological behavior. This fact makes analytical method development regarding their chiral separation indispensable. In this study, a chiral capillary zone electrophoresis method for the enantioseparation of 61 cathinone and pyrovalerone derivatives was developed by means of four different β-cyclodextrin derivatives. As chiral selectors, native β-cyclodextrin as well as three of its derivatives namely acetyl-β-cyclodextrin, 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, and carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin were used. The cathinone and pyrovalerone derivatives were either purchased in internet stores or seized by police. As a result, overall 58 of 61 studied substances were partially or baseline separated by at least one of the four chiral selectors using 10 mM of β-cyclodextrin derivative in a 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 2.5). Furthermore, the method was found to be suitable for simultaneous enantioseparations, for enantiomeric purity checks and to differentiate between positional isomers. Moreover, an intra- and an interday validation was performed successfully for each chiral selector to prove the robustness of the method.

Indexed as

Electrophoresis, Capillary2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrinAlkaloidsbeta-CyclodextrinsPyrrolidinesStereoisomerism2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrinAlkaloidsbeta-Cyclodextrinscarboxymethyl-beta-cyclodextrincathinonepyrovaleronePyrrolidines2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrinAcetyl-β-cyclodextrinCapillary electrophoresisCarboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrinCathinonesNative β-cyclodextrin

Identifiers

PMID31141181
PMCPMC6771503
OpenAlexW2947669261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.