ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Smart computational exploration of stochastic gene regulatory network models using human-in-the-loop semi-supervised learning.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trustworthy Agentic AI in Bioinformatics: From Workflow Automation to Traceable and Validated Biological Inference.Biology · 2026Review
- Scalable transcriptomics analysis with Dask: applications in data science and machine learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Interactive extraction of diverse vocal units from a planar embedding without the need for prior sound segmentation.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Scalable machine learning-assisted model exploration and inference using Sciope.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- A Review on Human-AI Interaction in Machine Learning and Insights for Medical Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- A Probabilistic Approach to Explore Signal Execution Mechanisms With Limited Experimental Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Convolutional Neural Networks as Summary Statistics for Approximate Bayesian Computation.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationDiscrete stochastic models of gene regulatory network models are indispensable tools for biological inquiry since they allow the modeler to predict how molecular interactions give rise to nonlinear system output. Model exploration with the objective of generating qualitative hypotheses about the workings of a pathway is usually the first step in the modeling process. It involves simulating the gene network model under a very large range of conditions, due to the large uncertainty in interactions and kinetic parameters. This makes model exploration highly computational demanding. Furthermore, with no prior information about the model behavior, labor-intensive manual inspection of very large amounts of simulation results becomes necessary. This limits systematic computational exploration to simplistic models.
resultsWe have developed an interactive, smart workflow for model exploration based on semi-supervised learning and human-in-the-loop labeling of data. The workflow lets a modeler rapidly discover ranges of interesting behaviors predicted by the model. Utilizing that similar simulation output is in proximity of each other in a feature space, the modeler can focus on informing the system about what behaviors are more interesting than others by labeling, rather than analyzing simulation results with custom scripts and workflows. This results in a large reduction in time-consuming manual work by the modeler early in a modeling project, which can substantially reduce the time needed to go from an initial model to testable predictions and downstream analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A python-package is available at https://github.com/Wrede/mio.git. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.