Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140715›Full record

ArticleHIV medicine2019

Population uptake and effectiveness of test-and-treat antiretroviral therapy guidelines for preventing the global spread of HIV: an ecological cross-national analysis.

A Mendez-Lopez, M McKee, D Stuckler, R Granich, S Gupta, T Noori, J C Semenza

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

A Mendez-LopezGreen Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8831-1684
M McKeeDepartment of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0121-9683
D StucklerDepartment of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
R GranichIndependent Public Health Consultant, San Francisco, CA, USA.
S GuptaIndependent Public Health Consultant, Delhi, India.
T NooriEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
J C SemenzaEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control · SEBocconi University · ITUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

European Research Council HRES313590Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough the benefits of adopting test-and-treat antiretroviral therapy (ART) guidelines that recommend initiation of ART regardless of CD4 cell counts have been demonstrated at the individual level, there is uncertainty about how this translates to the population level. Here, we explored whether adopting ART guidelines recommending earlier treatment initiation improves population ART access and viral suppression and reduces overall disease transmission.

methodsData on ART initiation guidelines and treatment coverage, viral suppression, and HIV incidence from 37 European and Central Asian countries were collected from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and the Global HIV Policy Watch and HIV 90-90-90 Watch databases. We used multivariate linear regression models to quantify the association of ART initiation guidelines with population ART access, viral suppression, and HIV incidence, adjusting for potential confounding factors.

resultsTest-and-treat policies were associated with 15.2 percentage points (pp) [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8-29.6 pp; P = 0.039] greater treatment coverage (proportion of HIV-positive people on ART) compared with countries with ART initiation at CD4 cell counts ≤ 350 cells/μL. The presence of test-and-treat policies was associated with 15.8 pp (95% CI 2.4-29.1 pp; P = 0.023) higher viral suppression rates (people on ART virally suppressed) compared with countries with treatment initiation at CD4 counts ≤ 350 cells/μL. ART initiation at CD4 counts ≤ 500 cells/μL did not significantly improve ART coverage compared to initiation at CD4 counts ≤ 350 cells/μL but achieved similar degrees of viral suppression as test-and-treat.

conclusionsTest-and-treat was found to be associated with substantial improvements in population-level access to ART and viral suppression, further strengthening evidence that rapid initiation of treatment will help curb the spread of HIV.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsAsia, CentralCD4 Lymphocyte CountDelivery of Health CareEuropeFemaleGlobal HealthHealth PolicyHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceLinear ModelsMalePractice Guidelines as TopicTime-to-TreatmentAnti-HIV Agentsecologicalhealth systemsHIV care continuumstructural driverstest-and-treat

Identifiers

PMID31140715
PMCPMC6772052
OpenAlexW2947092318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.