Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140596›Full record

Trial reportEpilepsia2019

Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters-a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Kamil Detyniecki, Peter J Van Ess, David J Sequeira, James W Wheless, Tze-Chiang Meng, William E Pullman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epilepsia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01390220 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Intranasal Midazolam), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01390220 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Intranasal Midazolam (USL261) in the Outpatient Treatment of Subjects With Seizure Clusters. ARTEMIS-1: Acute Rescue Therapy in Epilepsy With Midazolam Intranasal Spray-1

TypeinterventionalSponsorUCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.Ran2011 to 2017Enrolled292ConditionsEpilepsyArmsUSL261, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Strategies to innovate emergency care of status epilepticus.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  18. Long-Term Ambulatory Intracranial EEG.Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kamil DetynieckiDepartment of Neurology, Yale Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Peter J Van EssProximagen, LLC, Plymouth, Minnesota.
David J SequeiraProximagen, LLC, Plymouth, Minnesota.
James W WhelessLe Bonheur Comprehensive Epilepsy Program & Neuroscience Institute, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Tze-Chiang MengProximagen, LLC, Plymouth, Minnesota.
William E PullmanProximagen, LLC, Plymouth, Minnesota.
Michigan Manufacturing Technology Center · USLe Bonheur Children's Hospital · USYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

Proximagen LLC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel formulation of midazolam administered as a single-dose nasal spray (MDZ-NS) in the outpatient treatment of patients experiencing seizure clusters (SCs).

methodsThis was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390220) with patients age ≥12 years on a stable regimen of antiepileptic drugs. Following an in-clinic test dose phase (TDP), patients entered an outpatient comparative phase (CP) and were randomized (2:1) to receive double-blind MDZ-NS 5 mg or placebo nasal spray, administered by caregivers when they experienced an SC. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success (seizure termination within 10 minutes and no recurrence 10 minutes to 6 hours after trial drug administration). Secondary efficacy end points were proportion of patients with seizure recurrence 10 minutes to 4 hours, and time-to-next seizure >10 minutes after double-blind drug administration. Safety was monitored throughout.

resultsOf 292 patients administered a test dose, 262 patients were randomized, and 201 received double-blind treatment for an SC (n = 134 MDZ-NS, n = 67 placebo, modified intent-to-treat population). A significantly greater proportion of MDZ-NS- than placebo-treated patients achieved treatment success (53.7% vs 34.4%; P = 0.0109). Significantly, fewer MDZ-NS- than placebo-treated patients experienced seizure recurrence (38.1% vs 59.7%; P = 0.0043). Time-to-next seizure analysis showed early separation (within 30 minutes) between MDZ-NS and placebo that was maintained throughout the 24-hour observation period (21% difference at 24 hours; P = 0.0124). Sixteen patients (5.5%) discontinued because of a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the TDP and none during the CP. During the CP, 27.6% and 22.4% of patients in the MDZ-NS and placebo groups, respectively, experienced ≥1 TEAE. SIGNIFICANCE: MDZ-NS was superior to placebo in providing rapid, sustained seizure control when administered to patients experiencing an SC in the outpatient setting and was associated with a favorable safety profile.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdolescentAdultAgedAnticonvulsantsChildDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMidazolamMiddle AgedNasal SpraysSeizuresTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnticonvulsantsMidazolamNasal Spraysacute interventionacute repetitive seizuresbenzodiazepineepilepsyintranasalrescue

Identifiers

PMID31140596
PMCPMC9291143
OpenAlexW2947233910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.