Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140587›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2019

Adverse Effects of Pharmacologic Treatments of Major Depression in Older Adults.

Diana M Sobieraj, Brandon K Martinez, Adrian V Hernandez, Craig I Coleman, Joseph S Ross, Karina M Berg, David C Steffens, William L Baker

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pharmacotherapy of major depressive disorder in older adults: from an evidence-informed stepwise algorithm to precision medicine.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diana M SobierajUniversity of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut.
Brandon K MartinezUniversity of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut.
Adrian V HernandezUniversity of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut.
Craig I ColemanUniversity of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut.
Joseph S RossYale University School of Medicine and School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Karina M BergUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut.
David C SteffensUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut.
William L BakerUniversity of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0003-2172-0931
University of Connecticut · USYale University · US

Funding

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality HHSA290201500012I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess adverse effects of pharmacologic antidepressants for treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults 65 years of age or older.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

settingSpecialist or generalist outpatient setting, rehabilitation facility, and nursing facilities.

participantsPersons 65 years and older with MDD.

interventionSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), bupropion, mirtazapine, trazodone, vilazodone, or vortioxetine compared with another antidepressant, placebo, or nonpharmacologic therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Adverse events, arrhythmias, cognitive impairment, falls, fractures, hospitalization, mortality, QTc prolongation, serious adverse events, and withdrawals due to adverse events.

resultsNineteen randomized controlled trials and two observational studies were included. Most studies evaluated treatment of the acute phase (<12 wk) of MDD of moderate severity. SSRIs led to a statistically similar frequency of overall adverse events vs placebo (moderate strength of evidence [SOE]), but SNRIs caused more overall adverse events vs placebo (high SOE) during the acute treatment phase. Both SSRIs and SNRIs led to more study withdrawals due to adverse events vs placebo (SSRIs low SOE; SNRIs moderate SOE). Duloxetine led to a more falls vs placebo (moderate SOE) during 24 weeks of acute and continuation treatment of MDD.

conclusionIn patients 65 years of age or older with MDD, treatment of the acute phase of MDD with SNRIs, but not SSRIs, was associated with a statistically greater number of overall adverse events vs placebo. SSRIs and SNRIs led to a greater number of study withdrawals due to adverse events vs placebo. Duloxetine increased the risk of falls that as an outcome was underreported in the literature. Few studies examined head-to-head comparisons, most trials were not powered to evaluate adverse events, and results of observational studies may be confounded. Comparative long-term studies reporting specific adverse events are needed to inform clinical decision making regarding choice of antidepressants in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1571-1581, 2019.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntidepressive AgentsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitorsadverse eventsantidepressantsolder adults

Identifiers

PMID31140587
OpenAlexW2931770513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.