Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140573›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2019

Sexual Dichromatism Drives Diversification within a Major Radiation of African Amphibians.

Daniel M Portik, Rayna C Bell, David C Blackburn, Aaron M Bauer, Christopher D Barratt, William R Branch, Marius Burger, Alan Channing, Timothy J Colston, Werner Conradie and 29 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. No link between population isolation and speciation rate in squamate reptiles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tectonics, climate and the diversification of the tropical African terrestrial flora and fauna.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Daniel M PortikMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Rayna C BellMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
David C BlackburnFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Aaron M BauerDepartment of Biology, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085, USA.
Christopher D BarrattDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Basel 4056, Switzerland.
William R BranchPort Elizabeth Museum, P.O. Box 11347, Humewood 6013, South Africa.
Marius BurgerAfrican Amphibian Conservation Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa.
Alan ChanningUnit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa.
Timothy J ColstonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
Werner ConradiePort Elizabeth Museum, P.O. Box 11347, Humewood 6013, South Africa.
J Maximilian DehlingDepartment of Biology, Institute of Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Universitätsstr. 1, D-56070 Koblenz, Germany.
Robert C DrewesCalifornia Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
Raffael ErnstMuseum of Zoology, Senckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden, Königsbrücker Landstr. 159, Dresden 01109, Germany.
Eli GreenbaumDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
Václav GvoždíkThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Brno, Czech Republic.
James HarveyPietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Annika HillersMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Biodiversity Dynamics, Invalidenstr. 43, Berlin 10115, Germany.
Mareike HirschfeldMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Biodiversity Dynamics, Invalidenstr. 43, Berlin 10115, Germany.
Gregory F M JongsmaFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Jos KielgastNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Marcel T KoueteFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Lucinda P LawsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 614 Rieveschl Hall, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA.
Adam D LeachéDepartment of Biology, Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Simon P LoaderLife Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Stefan LöttersBiogeography Department, Trier University, Universitätsring 15, Trier 54296, Germany.
Arie Van Der MeijdenCIBIO Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrario de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, No. 7, 4485-661 Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal.
Michele MenegonTropical Biodiversity Section, Science Museum of Trento, Corso del lavoro e della Scienza 3, Trento 38122, Italy.
Susanne MüllerBiogeography Department, Trier University, Universitätsring 15, Trier 54296, Germany.
Zoltán T NagyRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, OD Taxonomy and Phylogeny, Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Caleb Ofori-BoatengForestry Research Institute of Ghana, P.O. Box 63, Fumesua, Kumasi, Ghana.
Annemarie OhlerDépartement Origines et Evolution, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7205 ISYEB, 25 rue Cuvier, Paris 75005, France.
Theodore J PapenfussMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Daniela RößlerBiogeography Department, Trier University, Universitätsring 15, Trier 54296, Germany.
Ulrich SinschDepartment of Biology, Institute of Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Universitätsstr. 1, D-56070 Koblenz, Germany.
Mark-Oliver RödelMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Biodiversity Dynamics, Invalidenstr. 43, Berlin 10115, Germany.
Michael VeithBiogeography Department, Trier University, Universitätsring 15, Trier 54296, Germany.
Jens VindumCalifornia Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
Ange-Ghislain Zassi-BoulouInstitut National de Recherche en Sciences Exactes et Naturelles, Brazzaville BP 2400, République du Congo.
Jimmy A McGuireMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Funding

Genome Sequencer FLXS10RR029668 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NGAI, JOHN J. · 2010 to 2010
$623k
Illumina Sequencer to Facilitate Functional Genomics at BerkeleyS10RR027303 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI TAYLOR, JOHN W. · 2010 to 2010
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027303NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory predicts that sexually dimorphic traits under strong sexual selection, particularly those involved with intersexual signaling, can accelerate speciation and produce bursts of diversification. Sexual dichromatism (sexual dimorphism in color) is widely used as a proxy for sexual selection and is associated with rapid diversification in several animal groups, yet studies using phylogenetic comparative methods to explicitly test for an association between sexual dichromatism and diversification have produced conflicting results. Sexual dichromatism is rare in frogs, but it is both striking and prevalent in African reed frogs, a major component of the diverse frog radiation termed Afrobatrachia. In contrast to most other vertebrates, reed frogs display female-biased dichromatism in which females undergo color transformation, often resulting in more ornate coloration in females than in males. We produce a robust phylogeny of Afrobatrachia to investigate the evolutionary origins of sexual dichromatism in this radiation and examine whether the presence of dichromatism is associated with increased rates of net diversification. We find that sexual dichromatism evolved once within hyperoliids and was followed by numerous independent reversals to monochromatism. We detect significant diversification rate heterogeneity in Afrobatrachia and find that sexually dichromatic lineages have double the average net diversification rate of monochromatic lineages. By conducting trait simulations on our empirical phylogeny, we demonstrate that our inference of trait-dependent diversification is robust. Although sexual dichromatism in hyperoliid frogs is linked to their rapid diversification and supports macroevolutionary predictions of speciation by sexual selection, the function of dichromatism in reed frogs remains unclear. We propose that reed frogs are a compelling system for studying the roles of natural and sexual selection on the evolution of sexual dichromatism across micro- and macroevolutionary timescales.

Indexed as

PhylogenyPigmentationAfricaAnimalsAnuraBiological EvolutionFemaleMaleSex CharacteristicsAfrobatrachiaAnuracolor evolutiondiversificationmacroevolutionsexual selection

Identifiers

PMID31140573
PMCPMC6934645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.