Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140436›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2019

Potential of Using Twitter to Recruit Cancer Survivors and Their Willingness to Participate in Nutrition Research and Web-Based Interventions: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Laura Keaver, Aisling McGough, Mengxi Du, Winnie Chang, Virginia Chomitz, Jennifer D Allen, Deanna J Attai, Lisa Gualtieri, Fang Fang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Next-Generation Scholarship: Rebranding Hematopathology Using Twitter: The MD Anderson Experience.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Health Field Regarding Social Networks and Young People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura KeaverClinical Health and Nutrition Centre, Department of Health and Nutritional Science, Institute of Technology Sligo, Sligo, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1369-5035
Aisling McGoughFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6188-3343
Mengxi DuFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6406-7250
Winnie ChangSmith College, Northampton, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1120-5805
Virginia ChomitzDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1795-7557
Jennifer D AllenDepartment of Community Health, Tufts University School of Arts and Sciences, Medford, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5888-7930
Deanna J AttaiDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1893-1183
Lisa GualtieriDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1960-2493
Fang Fang ZhangFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3130-0087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media is rapidly changing how cancer survivors search for and share health information and can potentially serve as a cost-effective channel to reach cancer survivors and invite them to participate in nutrition intervention programs.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the feasibility of using Twitter to recruit cancer survivors for a web-based survey and assess their willingness to complete web-based nutrition surveys, donate biospecimens, and to be contacted about web-based nutrition programs.

methodsWe contacted 301 Twitter accounts of cancer organizations, advocates, and survivors to request assistance promoting a web-based survey among cancer survivors. The survey asked respondents whether they would be willing to complete web-based nutrition or lifestyle surveys, donate biospecimens, and be contacted about web-based nutrition programs. Survey promotion rate was assessed by the percentage of Twitter accounts that tweeted the survey link at least once. Survey response was assessed by the number of survey respondents who answered at least 85% (26/30). We compared the characteristics of cancer survivors who responded to this survey with those who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2010 and evaluated factors associated with willingness to complete web-based surveys, donate biospecimens, and be contacted to participate in web-based nutrition programs among those who responded to the social media survey.

resultsOver 10 weeks, 113 Twitter account owners and 165 of their followers promoted the survey, and 444 cancer survivors provided complete responses. Two-thirds of respondents indicated that they would be willing to complete web-based nutrition or lifestyle surveys (297/444, 67.0%) and to be contacted to participate in web-based nutrition interventions (294/444, 66.2%). The percentage of respondents willing to donate biospecimens were 59.3% (263/444) for oral swab, 52.1% (231/444) for urine sample, 37.9% (168/444) for blood sample, and 35.6% (158/444) for stool sample. Compared with a nationally representative sample of 1550 cancer survivors in NHANES, those who responded to the social media survey were younger (53.1 years vs 60.8 years; P<.001), more likely to be female (93.9% [417/444] vs 58.7% [909/1550]; P<.001), non-Hispanic whites (85.4% [379/444] vs 64.0% [992/1550]; P<.001), to have completed college or graduate school (30.1 [133/444] vs 19.9% [308/444]; P<.001), and to be within 5 years of their initial diagnosis (55.2% [244/444] vs 34.1% [528/1550]; P<.001). Survivors younger than 45 years, female, and non-Hispanic whites were more willing to complete web-based nutrition surveys than older (65+ years), male, and racial or ethnic minority survivors. Non-Hispanic whites and breast cancer survivors were more willing to donate biospecimens than those with other race, ethnicity or cancer types.

conclusionsTwitter could be a feasible approach to recruit cancer survivors into nutrition research and web-based interventions with potentially high yields. Specific efforts are needed to recruit survivors who are older, male, racial and ethnic minorities, and from socioeconomically disadvantaged groups when Twitter is used as a recruitment method.

Indexed as

cancer survivorsnutrition surveysocial media

Identifiers

PMID31140436
PMCPMC6658224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.