Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140427›Full record

ArticleNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University2019

[Elimination of Gibbs artifact based on local subpixel shift and interlaced local variation].

Zhengce Wang, Kaixuan Zhao, Zhongbiao Xu, Yanqiu Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhengce WangSchool of Biomedical Enginnering, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Kaixuan ZhaoSchool of Biomedical Enginnering, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Zhongbiao XuSchool of Biomedical Enginnering, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Yanqiu FengSchool of Biomedical Enginnering, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo extend the application of Gibbs artifact reduction method that exploits local subvoxel- shifts (LSS) to zero- padded k-space magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data.

methodsWe investigated two approaches to extending the application of LSS-based method to under-sampled data. The first approach, namely LSS+ interpolation, utilized the original LSS-based method to minimize the local variation on nonzero-padding reconstructed images, followed by image interpolation to obtain the final images. The second approach, interlaced local variation, used zero-padded Fourier transformation followed by elimination of Gibbs artifacts by minimizing a novel interlaced local variations (iLV) term. We compared the two methods with the original LSS and Hamming window filter algorithms, and verified their feasibility and robustness in phantom and

resultsThe two methods proposed showed better performance than the original LSS and Hamming window filters and effectively eliminated Gibbs artifacts while preserving the image details. Compared to LSS + interpolation method, iLV method better preserved the details of the images.

conclusionsThe iLV and LSS+interpolation methods proposed herein both extend the application of the original LSS method and can eliminate Gibbs artifacts in zero-filled k-space data reconstruction images, and iLV method shows a more prominent advantage in retaining the image details.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsMagnetic Resonance ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingGibbs artifactsinterlaced local variationlocal subpixel shiftmagnetic resonance imagingzero padding

Identifiers

PMID31140427
PMCPMC6743943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.