Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140355›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Endovascular Treatment With or Without Prior Intravenous Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Vicky Chalos, Natalie E LeCouffe, Maarten Uyttenboogaart, Hester F Lingsma, Maxim J H L Mulder, Esmee Venema, Kilian M Treurniet, Omid Eshghi, H Bart van der Worp, Aad van der Lugt and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion; should we cross that bridge? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 36,123 patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment with or without intravenous alteplase in acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hemorrhagic Conversion of Acute Ischemic Stroke.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Vicky Chalos1 Department of Neurology Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Natalie E LeCouffe4 Department of Neurology Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Maarten Uyttenboogaart6 Department of Neurology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Hester F Lingsma2 Public Health Center for Medical Decision Making Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Maxim J H L Mulder1 Department of Neurology Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Esmee Venema2 Public Health Center for Medical Decision Making Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Kilian M Treurniet5 Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Omid Eshghi7 Radiology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
H Bart van der Worp8 Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery Brain Center Rudolf Magnus University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands.
Aad van der Lugt3 Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Yvo B W E M Roos4 Department of Neurology Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Charles B L M Majoie5 Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Diederik W J Dippel1 Department of Neurology Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Bob Roozenbeek1 Department of Neurology Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Jonathan M Coutinho4 Department of Neurology Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam The Netherlands.
MR CLEAN Registry Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background It is unclear whether intravenous thrombolysis ( IVT ) with alteplase before endovascular treatment ( EVT ) is beneficial for patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion. We compared clinical and procedural outcomes, safety, and workflow between patients treated with both IVT and EVT and those treated with EVT alone in routine clinical practice. Methods and Results Using multivariable regression, we evaluated the association of IVT + EVT with 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale), mortality, reperfusion, first-pass effect, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in The Netherlands) Registry. Of 1485 patients, 1161 (78%) were treated with IVT + EVT , and 324 (22%) with EVT alone. Patients treated with IVT + EVT had atrial fibrillation less often (16% versus 44%) and had better pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale scores (pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale 0: 73% versus 52%) than those treated with EVT alone. Procedure time was shorter in the IVT + EVT group (median 62 versus 68 minutes). Nontransferred IVT + EVT patients had longer door-to-groin-puncture times (median 105 versus 94 minutes). IVT + EVT was associated with better functional outcome (adjusted common odds ratio 1.47; 95% CI : 1.10-1.96) and lower mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.58; 95% CI : 0.40-0.82). Successful reperfusion, first-pass effect, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between groups. Conclusions In this observational study, patients treated with IVT + EVT had better clinical outcomes than patients who received EVT alone. This finding may demonstrate a true benefit of IVT before EVT , but its interpretation is hampered by the possibility of residual confounding and selection bias. Randomized trials are required to properly assess the effect of IVT before EVT .

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresThrombolytic TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaCombined Modality TherapyDisability EvaluationFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionRegistriesFibrinolytic AgentsTissue Plasminogen Activatorendovascular treatmentlarge vessel occlusionstrokethrombectomythrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID31140355
PMCPMC6585366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.