Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140330›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2019

The when and how of the gynaecological examination: a survey among Norwegian general practitioners.

Stefán Hjörleifsson, Bjørn Bjorvatn, Eivind Meland, Guri Rørtveit, Yngvild Hannestad, Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What influences GPs' use of pelvic examination? A qualitative investigation in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A Questionnaire-Based Study to Evaluate Health-Related Behaviors in 602 Women of Reproductive Age in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefán Hjörleifssona Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5936-0161
Bjørn Bjorvatna Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.
Eivind Melanda Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.
Guri Rørtveita Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.
Yngvild Hannestada Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.
Gunnar Tschudi Bondevika Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.
University of Bergen · NONORCE Research AS · NOUni Research (Norway) · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGender IdentityGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersPhysical ExaminationPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGynecologyHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPatient Acceptance of Health Carebimanual palpationGynaecological examinationphysician genderpractice variation

Identifiers

PMID31140330
PMCPMC6567104
OpenAlexW2947058393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.