Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140132›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2021

The identification of phytoextraction potential of Melilotus officinalis and Amaranthus retroflexus growing on copper- and molybdenum-polluted soils.

Karen A Ghazaryan, Hasmik S Movsesyan, Tatiana M Minkina, Svetlana N Sushkova, Vishnu D Rajput

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Special Issue on "Metallophytes for soil remediation" - Preface.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen A GhazaryanYerevan State University, 0025, Yerevan, Republic of Armenia. kghazaryan@ysu.am.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8973-2595
Hasmik S MovsesyanYerevan State University, 0025, Yerevan, Republic of Armenia.
Tatiana M MinkinaSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344006.
Svetlana N SushkovaSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344006.
Vishnu D RajputSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344006.
Southern Federal University · RUYerevan State University · AM

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research RFBR № 18-55-05023State Committee of Science SCS № 18RF-077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contamination of soils by heavy metals from the mining industry nowadays is one of the greatest threats to environment and human health. The cleaning of polluted soils using cost-effective and eco-friendly methods such as phytoextraction has wide public recognition. Considering the above-mentioned ones, the objectives of the present study were the identification of Cu and Mo accumulation capability and the phytoextraction potential of Melilotus officinalis and Amaranthus retroflexus as well as the determination of the influence of ammonium nitrate and EDTA on phytoextraction effectiveness. The contaminated soil samples for phytoremediation experiments under ex situ conditions were collected from the surroundings of the Zangezur Copper and Molybdenum Combine, Armenia. During the studies, it was found out that M. officinalis and A. retroflexus are capable of growing in polluted soils. M. officinalis grown in polluted soil had greater ability to accumulate heavy metals in roots, while the ability to transport the copper to aboveground parts was more pronounced in A. retroflexus. During the growing of these plant species for phytoextraction of soils contaminated by copper, it is necessary to use chelates, in particular the EDTA, for the enhancement of the effectiveness of phytoextraction process. EDTA due to chelating influence increased the availability of copper for plants and its mobility in them that lead to greater accumulation of this metal in shoots. The application of chelates did not have a significant impact on molybdenum accumulation intensity in plants; therefore, in case of this metal, it is unreasonable to use additional chelating compounds.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalAmaranthusArmeniaChelating AgentsCopperEdetic AcidMelilotusMetals, HeavyMolybdenumPlant RootsSoil PollutantsChelating AgentsCopperEdetic AcidMetals, HeavyMolybdenumSoil PollutantsChelateHeavy metalPhytoextractionSoil contaminationTranslocation factor

Identifiers

PMID31140132
OpenAlexW2947643542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.