Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140076›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2019

Mass Accuracy Check Using Common Background Peaks for Improving Metabolome Data Quality in Chemical Isotope Labeling LC-MS.

Yunong Li, Liang Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yunong LiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G2, Canada.
Liang LiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G2, Canada. Liang.Li@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-2108
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

Alberta Innovates n/aCanada Foundation for Innovation n/aCanada Research Chairs n/aCIHR n/aGenome Alberta n/aGenome Canada n/aNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical isotope labeling (CIL) LC-MS is a highly sensitive and quantitative method for metabolome analysis. Because of a large number of peaks detectable in a sample and the need of running many samples in a metabolomics project, any significant change in mass measurement accuracy during the whole period of running samples can adversely affect the downstream peak alignment and quantitative analysis. Herein, we report a rapid method to check the mass accuracy of individual spectra in each CIL LC-MS run in order to flag up any run containing spectra with accuracy drift that falls outside the expected error. The flagged run may be re-run or discarded before merging with other runs for peak alignment and analysis. This method is based on the observation that some background signals are commonly detected in almost all spectra collected in CIL LC-MS runs. A mass accuracy check (MAC) software program has been developed to first find the common background mass peaks and then use them as mass references to calculate any mass shifts over the course of multiple sample runs. Using a metabolome dataset of 324 human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples and 35 quality control (QC) samples produced by CIL LC-MS, we show that this accuracy check method can streamline the initial raw data processing for downstream analysis in metabolomics.

Indexed as

MetabolomeSoftwareCalibrationCarbon IsotopesCerebrospinal FluidChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDansyl CompoundsData AccuracyHumansIsotope LabelingMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSpinal Cord InjuriesCarbon-13Carbon Isotopesdansyl chlorideDansyl CompoundsChemical isotope labelingLC-MSMass accuracyMetabolome analysisMetabolomicsPeak alignment

Identifiers

PMID31140076
OpenAlexW2947785248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.