ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2019
Effect of agmatine on food intake in mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi).
Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative study of the role of nitric oxide in the regulation of food intake across vertebrates.Journal of veterinary science · 2026Review
- Probiotics Improve Eating Disorders in Mandarin Fish (Microorganisms · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Agmatine, an endogenous biogenic amine, is considered to be a central neurotransmitter. And it plays an important role in mammal feeding behavior. However, there were few studies on the effect of agmatine on feeding behavior in fishes. Here, we investigated the impact of intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of agmatine (1.25-20 nmol/fish) on food intake in mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi). At 1-h post-injection, food intake showed a significant decrease in agmatine-treated fishes compared with the saline treated. Furthermore, the food intake in agmatine treatment mostly did not differ from that in saline treatment at 4--24-h post-injection as well as the results of genes expression of neuropeptide Y (NPY), agouti-regulated peptide (AgRP), and anorexigenic melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R). In accordance with the insulin level increasing in liver, the gene expression of insulin receptor substrate (IRS2) was significantly higher in agmatine treatment compared to saline treatment at 1-h post-injection. Thus, the anorexigenic effect of agmatine is likely to decrease NPY and AgRP expression levels and increase MC4R and IRS2 levels which was coupled with stimulation of insulin secretion. Although these initial findings are limited in dose, the data firstly provides evidence for the anorectic effects of agmatine in fish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.