Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140071›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Quality of molecular detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci: results of 6 consecutive years of Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) external quality assessment.

Veerle Matheeussen, Katherine Loens, Calum Scott, Caterina Di Lorenzo, Elaine McCulloch, Oliver Donoso Mantke, Herman Goossens, Paul Wallace, Margareta Ieven

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Enterococci.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Veerle MatheeussenDepartment of Microbiology, National Reference Centre for Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium. veerle.matheeussen@uza.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7217-3643
Katherine LoensDepartment of Microbiology, National Reference Centre for Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Calum ScottQuality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD), 5/6 Technology Terrace, Todd Campus, West of Scotland Science Park, Glasgow, UK, G20 0XA, UK.
Caterina Di LorenzoQuality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD), 5/6 Technology Terrace, Todd Campus, West of Scotland Science Park, Glasgow, UK, G20 0XA, UK.
Elaine McCullochQuality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD), 5/6 Technology Terrace, Todd Campus, West of Scotland Science Park, Glasgow, UK, G20 0XA, UK.
Oliver Donoso MantkeQuality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD), 5/6 Technology Terrace, Todd Campus, West of Scotland Science Park, Glasgow, UK, G20 0XA, UK.
Herman GoossensDepartment of Microbiology, National Reference Centre for Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Paul WallaceQuality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD), 5/6 Technology Terrace, Todd Campus, West of Scotland Science Park, Glasgow, UK, G20 0XA, UK.
Margareta IevenDepartment of Microbiology, National Reference Centre for Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of PCR to detect vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) was evaluated by analysing their performance in six consecutive external quality assessment (EQA) schemes, organized annually since 2013 by Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics. VRE EQA panels consisted of 12-14 heat-inactivated samples. Sensitivity was tested with vanA-positive Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium), vanB-positive E. faecium, E. faecalis or E. gallinarum or vanC-positive E. gallinarum in different concentrations. Vancomycin-susceptible enterococci, Staphylococcus aureus or sample matrix was used to study the specificity. Participants were asked to report the VRE resistance status of each sample. The detection rate of vanA-positive samples was already 95% in the 2013 EQA panel (range 94-97%) and remained stable over the years. The 2013 detection rate of vanB-positive samples was 82% but increased significantly by more than 10% in subsequent years (96% in 2014, 95% in 2015, 92% in 2016 and 93% in 2017/2018, p < 0.05). The vanC detection rate by the limited number of assays specifically targeting this gene was lower compared to vanA/B (range 55-89%). The number of false positives in the true-negative sample (8% in 2013 to 1.4% in 2018) as well as the van-gene-negative bacterial samples (4% in 2013 to 0% in 2018) declined over the years. In the six years of VRE proficiency testing to date, the detection of vanA-positive strains was excellent and an increased sensitivity in vanB detection as well as an increase in specificity was observed. Commercial and in-house assays performed equally well.

Indexed as

Quality ControlAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCarbon-Oxygen LigasesEnterococcus faeciumGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPathology, MolecularPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityVancomycin ResistanceVancomycin-Resistant EnterococciAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCarbon-Oxygen LigasesVanA ligase, BacteriaMolecular diagnosticsProficiency testingVancomycin resistanceVRE

Identifiers

PMID31140071
OpenAlexW2947547050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.