Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140049›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2019

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleed: An audit of the causes and outcomes from a tertiary care center in eastern India.

Arka Banerjee, Saptarshi Bishnu, Gopal Krishna Dhali

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comprehensive review on the current management of upper-GI bleed.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  2. Comparison of risk assessment scores of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Proposal for a simplified score.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arka BanerjeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, 700 020, India.
Saptarshi BishnuDepartment of Hepatology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, 700 020, India. saptarshibishnu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9001-9463
Gopal Krishna DhaliDepartment of Gastroenterology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, 700 020, India.
Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purpose of the studyAcute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleed is a life-threatening emergency carrying risks of rebleed and mortality despite standard pharmacological and endoscopic management. We aimed to determine etiologies of acute UGI bleed in hospitalized patients and outcomes (rebleed rates, 5-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, 6-week mortality, need for surgery) and to determine predictors of rebleed and mortality.

methodsClinical and endoscopic findings were recorded in patients aged > 12 years who presented within 72 h of onset of UGI bleed. Outcomes were recorded during the hospital stay and 6 weeks after discharge.

resultsA total of 305 patients were included in this study, mean age being 44 ± 17 years. Most common etiology of UGI bleed was portal hypertension (62.3%) followed by peptic ulcer disease (PUD) (16.7%). Rebleed rate within 6 weeks was 37.4% (portal hypertension 47.9%, PUD 21.6%, malignancy 71.4%). Five-day mortality was 2.3% (malignancy 14.3%, portal hypertension 3.2%); the in-hospital mortality rate was 3.0% (malignancy 14.3%, portal hypertension 3.2%, PUD 0.0%) and 4.9% at 6 weeks (malignancy 28.6%, portal hypertension 5.8%, PUD 0.0%). Surgery was required in 4.59% patients. On multivariate analysis, post-endoscopy Rockall score was significantly predictive of rebleed in both portal hypertension- and PUD-related rebleed. No factors were found predictive of mortality in multivariate analysis.

conclusionPortal hypertension remains the commonest cause of UGI bleed in India and carries a higher risk of rebleed and mortality as compared to PUD-related bleed. Post-endoscopy Rockall score is a useful tool for clinicians to assess risk of rebleed.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEsophageal and Gastric VaricesFemaleGastric Antral Vascular EctasiaHematemesisHospital MortalityHumansHypertension, PortalIndiaLiver CirrhosisMaleMelenaEtiologyMortalityRebleedUpper gastrointestinal bleed

Identifiers

PMID31140049
OpenAlexW2947451677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.