Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31140016›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019

Assessment of topsoil contamination in an urbanized interfluve region of Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) using magnetic measurements and spectroscopic techniques.

Abhishek Kumar Rai, Anuj Kumar Singh, Jayanta Kumar Pati, Shubham Gupta, Munmun Chakarvorty, Ambalika Niyogi, Anamika Pandey, Mrigank Mauli Dwivedi, Kamlesh Pandey, Kuldeep Prakash

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abhishek Kumar RaiDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nehru Science Centre, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, 211002, India.
Anuj Kumar SinghDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nehru Science Centre, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, 211002, India.
Jayanta Kumar PatiDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nehru Science Centre, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, 211002, India. jkpati@gmail.com.
Shubham GuptaNational Centre of Experimental Mineralogy and Petrology, 14 Chatham Lines, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, 211002, India.
Munmun ChakarvortyNational Centre of Experimental Mineralogy and Petrology, 14 Chatham Lines, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, 211002, India.
Ambalika NiyogiDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nehru Science Centre, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, 211002, India.
Anamika PandeyDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nehru Science Centre, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, 211002, India.
Mrigank Mauli DwivediNational Centre of Experimental Mineralogy and Petrology, 14 Chatham Lines, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, 211002, India.
Kamlesh PandeyNational Centre of Experimental Mineralogy and Petrology, 14 Chatham Lines, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, 211002, India.
Kuldeep PrakashDepartment of Geology, Faculty of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnetic susceptibility (MS) measurements are used for rapid and cost-effective soil surveys and for accessing heavy metal contamination worldwide. In the sub-Himalayan plains of India, nearly 6.05 × 10

Indexed as

UrbanizationCitiesEnvironmental MonitoringIndiaMagnetometryMetals, HeavyRiversSoilSoil PollutantsSpectrum AnalysisMetals, HeavySoilSoil PollutantsHeavy metalsIndo-Gangetic PlainsInterfluvesMagnetic susceptibilityTopsoil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.